RE: RE:Pre-draft: SEAL as an IPv6 extension header(was:Fragmentation-related Security issues) (Templin, Fred L)

2012-01-13 Thread Templin, Fred L
: Sreenatha setty; fltemp...@acm.org Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: RE: RE:Pre-draft: SEAL as an IPv6 extension header(was:Fragmentation-related Security issues) (Templin, Fred L) Hi Sreenatha, You are right that the draft needs to be clarified on this point. The answer is that whether or not there

RE: RE:Pre-draft: SEAL as an IPv6 extension header(was:Fragmentation-related Security issues) (Templin, Fred L)

2012-01-13 Thread Templin, Fred L
Behalf Of Sreenatha setty Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2012 8:45 PM To: fltemp...@acm.org Cc: ipv6@ietf.org Subject: RE:Pre-draft: SEAL as an IPv6 extension header(was:Fragmentation-related Security issues) (Templin, Fred L) Hi Fred, In the draft, the behavior of destination node in processin

RE:Pre-draft: SEAL as an IPv6 extension header(was:Fragmentation-related Security issues) (Templin, Fred L)

2012-01-13 Thread Sreenatha setty
Hi Fred, In the draft, the behavior of destination node in processing the SEAL header is need to be cleared. If nodes are not exchanging symmetric key and it received SEAL extension header packet and the packet is not ICMPv6 error packet, how destination node should process the SEAL header?