Re: Re: On draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-03

2013-03-20 Thread zhou . sujing
Thank you. My question come from the so misleading Appendix A text: "It discusses a (non-exaustive) number of scenarios in which host privacy is still sacrificed even when privacy/temporary addresses [RFC4941] are employed, as a result of employing interface identifiers that are constant across

Re: On draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-03

2013-03-20 Thread Fernando Gont
Hi, Zhou, On 03/19/2013 06:14 AM, zhou.suj...@zte.com.cn wrote: > > I kind did not understand the privacy issues of RFC4941 describbed in > Appendeix A. > To my reading and understanding of RFC4941, > RFC4941 specified to use privacy/temporary address defined as: > temporary address= subnet