Hi Folks,
Some RFCs (I know of at least 2, RFC2526 and RFC4291) reserve a set
of interface identifiers on all prefixes. These identifiers need to be
excluded when a node autoconfigures an address. This problem occurs with
privacy addresses but is equally applicable to other address assigment
Hello,
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 18:19:39 Suresh Krishnan wrote:
http://tools.ietf.org/wg/ipv6/draft-krishnan-ipv6-reserved-iids-01.txt
I wonder if ISATAP needs to be included here. It was my understanding that you
cannot use non-ISATAP IIDs on ISATAP virtual links, and that ISATAP IIDs
Hi Remi,
Thanks for pointing this out. Fred Templin convinced me that
including ISATAP IIDs was not necessary. I am convinced as well, but I
could not make the change in time for the cutoff. I will remove these in
-02.
Thanks
Suresh
Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote:
Hello,
On Tuesday
