Re: SLAAC for 1:1 VLAN model

2010-09-15 Thread Tom Taylor
... and notifications via ANCP if that is running. On 15/09/2010 2:37 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: Indeed. And the router needs to send out an individual RA per interface. So a router aggregating 20.000 customers will need to send out 20.000 RAs on a regular basis. So the router is configured

Re: SLAAC for 1:1 VLAN model

2010-09-15 Thread sthaug
> > Indeed. And the router needs to send out an individual RA per interface. > > So a router aggregating 20.000 customers will need to send out 20.000 > > RAs on a regular basis. > > So the router is configured to know all the VLANs up front? > Or does the router somehow get notified when the cust

Re: SLAAC for 1:1 VLAN model

2010-09-15 Thread Erik Nordmark
On 09/14/10 11:21 PM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: in the 1:1 model the router will just advertise prefixes in RAs like on any other link. there is a one to one mapping between VLAN and customer. imagine a VLAN modeled as an interface. (not commenting on rs-mark, just the 1:1 VLAN model) Indeed.

Re: SLAAC for 1:1 VLAN model

2010-09-14 Thread sthaug
> in the 1:1 model the router will just advertise prefixes in RAs like on any > other link. > there is a one to one mapping between VLAN and customer. imagine a VLAN > modeled as an interface. (not commenting on rs-mark, just the 1:1 VLAN model) Indeed. And the router needs to send out an indiv

Re: SLAAC for 1:1 VLAN model

2010-09-14 Thread Ole Troan
> I've finally caught up on the discussion about rs-mark and the N:1 VLAN > model. One of the key technical issues is how a SLAAC host recovers should > its three RS messages be lost. > > Can someone explain to me how this works with SLAAC in the 1:1 VLAN model? > > It seems like the router wou

SLAAC for 1:1 VLAN model

2010-09-14 Thread Erik Nordmark
I've finally caught up on the discussion about rs-mark and the N:1 VLAN model. One of the key technical issues is how a SLAAC host recovers should its three RS messages be lost. Can someone explain to me how this works with SLAAC in the 1:1 VLAN model? It seems like the router would need to