On Thu, 6 May 2004 16:59:20 +0100 (BST),
Girish Kamath [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
For Neighbor Discovery messages, is it mandatory that the scope of the source
and destination address should match?
If i have just a link-local unicast address on a node A connected to another node B
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Scope Issue
Hello, For Neighbor Discovery messages, is it mandatory that the scope of the source and destination address should match?If i have just a link-local unicast address on a node A connected to another node B which has global unicast addresses configured, can i
ay, May 06, 2004 11:59 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Scope Issue
Hello, For Neighbor Discovery messages, is it mandatory that the scope of the source and destination address should match?If i have just a link-local unicast address on a node A connected to another node B which has global unicast
Girish Kamath wrote:
NS message *always* uses a link-local address as a source address.
That is false. The source address of NS packets SHOULD be the same as
the source address of the packet that promps the NS packet to be sent.
See section 7.2.2 of RFC2461.
Is it true even when a node is
Hello, For Neighbor Discovery messages, is it mandatory that the scope of the source and destination address should match?If i have just a link-local unicast address on a node A connected to another node B which has global unicast addresses configured, can i form a ND message with source address
