On May 27, 2005, at 1:40 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
Does anyone really see any value in 1?
And this is always possible - just don't configure the DHCPv6 server
with any configuration parameters to send out.
1 seems a bit odd, yes.
--
, May 27, 2005 3:24 PM
> > To: ipv6@ietf.org; dhcwg@ietf.org
> > Subject: [dhcwg] Semantics of Stateful Bits for the Client
> >
> > If we believe we will inform clients to use or not use dhc and I am
> > going to guess all agree with that so we have to multitask here in
>
t: Friday, May 27, 2005 3:24 PM
> To: ipv6@ietf.org; dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: [dhcwg] Semantics of Stateful Bits for the Client
>
> If we believe we will inform clients to use or not use dhc and I am
> going to guess all agree with that so we have to multitask here in
> cyberspac
If we believe we will inform clients to use or not use dhc and I am
going to guess all agree with that so we have to multitask here in
cyberspace.
What semantic conditions do we inform clients about when we inform them
to use dhc via ND packet.
Points from the many mails are as follows.
1. use d
