Hi,
I suggest the same to the authors of
draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-sol-00.txt. Could you please first describe
what is the problem with SAS as specified in RFC 3484.
Hemant
sorry for the looong delay,
As stated in this document section 1,
Today, the RFC 3484 mechanism is widely
@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Use longest-matching prefix to the next hop
Hi,
I suggest the same to the authors of
draft-ietf-6man-addr-select-sol-00.txt. Could you please first
describe what is the problem with SAS as specified in RFC 3484.
Hemant
sorry for the looong delay,
As stated
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
FUJIKAWA Kenji
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 11:34 PM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Use longest-matching prefix to the next hop
Hemant Singh;
Thank you for your comments.
At Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:01:27 -0500,
Hemant Singh (shemant) wrote
: fujikawakenji
Tel: +66 8-4773-3252
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
FUJIKAWA Kenji
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 11:34 PM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Use longest-matching prefix to the next hop
Hemant Singh;
Thank you
.
Hemant
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
FUJIKAWA Kenji
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 9:31 PM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Use longest-matching prefix to the next hop
Hi all,
I am submitting an ID,
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
FUJIKAWA Kenji
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 9:31 PM
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Use longest-matching prefix to the next hop
Hi all,
I am submitting an ID,
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/staging/draft-fujikawa-ipv6-src-addr-sel
ection-02.txt
and suggesting
Hi all,
I am submitting an ID,
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/staging/draft-fujikawa-ipv6-src-addr-selection-02.txt
and suggesting in the draft that,
Before Rule 8 (Use longest matching prefix) in section 5. (Source
Address Selection) in RFC3484, the rule using longest-matching
