Good. Please make sure the RFC Editor gets the final AUTH48 change in e-mail so that I
can say "approve"...
Jari
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo
This last call was completed on 17 November 2011. There was no objection
raised during the last call. The topic was also discussed at the Taipei 6man
session. The minutes show:
Node Requirements update based on new Flow Label RFC, Chairs, 10 min.
g Group last call for adding RFC6437 Flow Label support
> to Node Requirements bis document
>
> This email starts a one week 6MAN Working Group last call for adding
> text and a reference to RFC6437 "IPv6 Flow Label Specification" to the
> Node Requirements bis document current in
Agree.
On 11 Nov 2011, at 04:13, Shane Amante wrote:
>
> On Nov 10, 2011, at 12:53 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> I support this change.
>
> +1.
>
> -shane
>
>
>
>> Regards
>> Brian Carpenter
>>
>> On 2011-11-11 06:00, Bob Hinden wrote:
>>> This email starts a one week 6MAN Working Group
On Nov 10, 2011, at 12:53 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I support this change.
+1.
-shane
> Regards
> Brian Carpenter
>
> On 2011-11-11 06:00, Bob Hinden wrote:
>> This email starts a one week 6MAN Working Group last call for adding text
>> and a reference to RFC6437 "IPv6 Flow Label Spe
I support this change.
Regards
Brian Carpenter
On 2011-11-11 06:00, Bob Hinden wrote:
> This email starts a one week 6MAN Working Group last call for adding text and
> a reference to RFC6437 "IPv6 Flow Label Specification" to the Node
> Requirements bis document current in AUTH48 state. The
This email starts a one week 6MAN Working Group last call for adding text and a
reference to RFC6437 "IPv6 Flow Label Specification" to the Node Requirements
bis document current in AUTH48 state. The document is currently on hold in the
RFC Editor waiting for resolution of this issue.
The pr
