On Mar 29, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 29 Mar 2012, at 14:15 , Brian Haberman wrote:
>
>> It is not an assumption, it is stately quite clearly in the Scoped
>> Addressing Architecture (RFC 4007). From Section 5 :
>
>> A zone of a given scope (less than global) falls
On 3/29/12 8:52 AM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
On 29 Mar 2012, at 14:15 , Brian Haberman wrote:
It is not an assumption, it is stately quite clearly in the Scoped
Addressing Architecture (RFC 4007). From Section 5 :
A zone of a given scope (less than global) falls completely within
zones o
On 29 Mar 2012, at 14:15 , Brian Haberman wrote:
> It is not an assumption, it is stately quite clearly in the Scoped Addressing
> Architecture (RFC 4007). From Section 5 :
> A zone of a given scope (less than global) falls completely within
> zones of larger scope. That is, a smalle
On 3/29/12 7:16 AM, Stig Venaas wrote:
On 3/29/2012 3:38 AM, Kerry Lynn wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum
mailto:iljit...@muada.com>> wrote:
On 28 Mar 2012, at 12:08 , Fred Baker wrote:
>> I haven't read the spec yet, but isn't PCP supposed to work in
the service pr
On 3/29/2012 3:38 AM, Kerry Lynn wrote:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum
mailto:iljit...@muada.com>> wrote:
On 28 Mar 2012, at 12:08 , Fred Baker wrote:
>> I haven't read the spec yet, but isn't PCP supposed to work in
the service provider run NAT64/CGN case,
On Mar 29, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> On 28 Mar 2012, at 12:08 , Fred Baker wrote:
>
>>> I haven't read the spec yet, but isn't PCP supposed to work in the service
>>> provider run NAT64/CGN case, too? In that case, the multicasts need to
>>> escape out of the site or eve
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum
wrote:
> On 28 Mar 2012, at 12:08 , Fred Baker wrote:
>
> >> I haven't read the spec yet, but isn't PCP supposed to work in the
> service provider run NAT64/CGN case, too? In that case, the multicasts need
> to escape out of the site or even o
On 28 Mar 2012, at 12:08 , Fred Baker wrote:
>> I haven't read the spec yet, but isn't PCP supposed to work in the service
>> provider run NAT64/CGN case, too? In that case, the multicasts need to
>> escape out of the site or even organization to reach the service provider at
>> least in the SO
