james woodyatt wrote:
On Jun 28, 2007, at 14:30, Roger Jorgensen wrote:
about part one - both the RIR and LIR field can be set to zero's for
direct assignment, for other they can go through RIR.
That's not how I read Mr. Vixie's proposed text. If both RIR and LIR
are zero, that implies a U
On Jun 28, 2007, at 14:30, Roger Jorgensen wrote:
about part one - both the RIR and LIR field can be set to zero's
for direct assignment, for other they can go through RIR.
That's not how I read Mr. Vixie's proposed text. If both RIR and LIR
are zero, that implies a ULA prefix that IANA r
Yes, I agree that any site should be able to get a ULA-C assignment, at
nominal cost, and that ULA netblocks should be kept out of the DFZ.
-Scott
Roger Jorgensen wrote:
Hi all,
if we overlook the last part about DNS for now, is this acceptable by
people? I've read this through several times
Hi all,
if we overlook the last part about DNS for now, is this acceptable by
people? I've read this through several times and I belive it satifsy the
following asked by "Templin, Fred L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1) can any site (large or small) get a ULA-C?
2) can the ULA-C's be obtained at a
