Hello Kerry,
Sorry for late reply.
I do agree with your comments and my comments below are non-blocking on
the advancement of this draft. I support advancement of this
draft.
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Alexandru Petrescu
wrote:
Comments on draft draft-lynn-6man-6lobac-00:
- needs a
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Alexandru Petrescu <
alexandru.petre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Comments on draft draft-lynn-6man-6lobac-00:
>
> - needs a section on multicast address mapping; it may not be
> straightforward: it may need to _not_ send all ip-multicasted messages to
> 255 link-layer
Comments on draft draft-lynn-6man-6lobac-00:
- needs a section on multicast address mapping; it may not be
straightforward: it may need to _not_ send all ip-multicasted messages
to 255 link-layer address: the solicited-node multicast address includes
the octet address (as opposed to eg ethern
