Re: draft-yhb-6man-ra-privacy-flag-00

2011-02-24 Thread RJ Atkinson
On 24 Feb 2011 at 09:35:12 -0800, James Woodyatt wrote: >> On Feb 24, 2011, at 6:19 AM, Yu Hua bing wrote: >> Hello, what do you think of this draft? >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yhb-6man-ra-privacy-flag/ > > > I don't see why using A=0 in the PIO is insufficient for this purpose. U

Re: draft-yhb-6man-ra-privacy-flag-00

2011-02-24 Thread james woodyatt
On Feb 24, 2011, at 6:19 AM, Yu Hua bing wrote: > > Hello, what do you think of this draft? > I don't see why using A=0 in the PIO is insufficient for this purpose. That said, I also think a huge flaw in the draft is that existin

draft-yhb-6man-ra-privacy-flag-00

2011-02-24 Thread Yu Hua bing
Hello, what do you think of this draft? http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yhb-6man-ra-privacy-flag/ Abstract The temporary addresses described by RFC4941 makes it more difficult for eavesdroppers and other information collectors to track the hosts,but also bring trouble to the netw