The MO bits were
defined long before we had DHCPv6 in place.
And they were discussed to death in the WG before the draft reached
WG consensus. I'm not inclined to reopen that discussion.
(Somebody added ietf@ietf.org to this thread. I have removed it.)
Brian
Yeah. I have to agree with James and Brian: in retrospect, the M/O bits are
useless and further discussion at this point is even more useless.
- Ralph
On 11/29/06 4:58 AM, Brian E Carpenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The MO bits were
defined long before we had DHCPv6 in place.
And they
; Thomas Narten
Cc: Brian Haberman; Bob Hinden; William Allen Simpson; General Area
Review Team; Erik Nordmark; ipv6@ietf.org; Soliman,Hesham
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Re: gen-art review of
draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
Yeah. I have to agree with James and Brian: in retrospect, the M/O
bits
Soliman, Hesham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'll start with my protocol question:
7.2.7 Anycast neighbor announcements
- Second, the Override flag in Neighbor Advertisements SHOULD be
set to 0, so that when multiple advertisements are
received, the
@ietf.org
Subject: RE: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
4.2 router advertisement
- Note: If neither M nor O flags are set this indicates that no
information is available via DHCPv6.
This means that the responding router always knows if DHCPv6 is
definitely
Ralph Droms (rdroms) writes:
-Original Message-
From: Soliman, Hesham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
4.2 router advertisement
- Note: If neither M nor O flags are set this indicates that no
information is available via DHCPv6.
This means that the responding
; William
Allen Simpson; ipv6@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: RE: gen-art review of draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt
4.2 router advertisement
- Note: If neither M nor O flags are set this indicates that no
information is available via DHCPv6.
This means that the responding
Thomas, I agree with everything you say below except that some of what
you say may, in fact, be the justifications we are looking for. I
didn't say examples, I said explanations. See below ...
On 11/22/2006 09:06 AM, Thomas Narten allegedly wrote:
Scott W Brim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I
Scott W Brim [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have one question on the protocol, and several on documentation.
Since this is a significant protocol, documentation is very important.
For the sake of new implementors I have a number of suggestions for
clarity. Many of them have to do with the use
Thanks for the comments! Sorry for the late reply. Some comments inline
I have one question on the protocol, and several on documentation.
Since this is a significant protocol, documentation is very
important.
For the sake of new implementors I have a number of suggestions for
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-ipv6-2461bis-09.txt.
For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html. Please
resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.
Summary statement: This draft is
11 matches
Mail list logo
