On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 06:59:45AM -0400, Brian Haberman wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> On Apr 4, 2005, at 22:12, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> >
> >On 4 Apr 2005, at 08:35, Pekka Savola wrote:
> >
> >>This is a timely topic, because IPv6 WG just less than week ago
> >>forwarded the revision of the addressing arc
Hi Joe,
On Apr 4, 2005, at 22:12, Joe Abley wrote:
On 4 Apr 2005, at 08:35, Pekka Savola wrote:
This is a timely topic, because IPv6 WG just less than week ago
forwarded the revision of the addressing architecture to be published
as Draft Standard. (IPv6 WG is Cc:ed.)
That draft,
http://www.
On 4 Apr 2005, at 08:35, Pekka Savola wrote:
This is a timely topic, because IPv6 WG just less than week ago
forwarded the revision of the addressing architecture to be published
as Draft Standard. (IPv6 WG is Cc:ed.)
That draft,
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-
Joe,
This is a timely topic, because IPv6 WG just less than week ago
forwarded the revision of the addressing architecture to be published
as Draft Standard. (IPv6 WG is Cc:ed.)
That draft,
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-addr-arch-v4-02.txt
still has the problematic wordin
