Re: new revision of rfc2462bis is available

2004-02-11 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / $B?@L@C#:H(B
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:56:12 +0100, > Felipe Alfaro Solana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I don't understand how is it possible for two hosts to communicate when > no stateful server or router advertising a prefix is attached to the > link. In this case, both hosts are configured exclusive

Re: new revision of rfc2462bis is available

2004-02-10 Thread Felipe Alfaro Solana
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 13:38, JINMEI Tatuya / çæéå wrote: > I've submitted a new revision of the rfc2462bis draft: > draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt > > I expect a certain amount of delay before the draft is ready at the > official I-D archive, so I put a copy of the draft at the following URL:

new revision of rfc2462bis is available

2004-02-10 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / $B?@L@C#:H(B
I've submitted a new revision of the rfc2462bis draft: draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt I expect a certain amount of delay before the draft is ready at the official I-D archive, so I put a copy of the draft at the following URL: http://www.jinmei.org/draft-ietf-ipv6-rfc2462bis-00.txt Any commen