Since then, router solicitations would be issued regularly until
client recieves RA with RDNSS, connection is cancelled by user or:
We have a setup here were we have 50+ clients on some access points
with about 100 access points distributed over the campus, all merged
into one network. Let's
On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 09:47 +0200, Dan Luedtke wrote:
Since then, router solicitations would be issued regularly until
client recieves RA with RDNSS, connection is cancelled by user or:
We have a setup here were we have 50+ clients on some access points
with about 100 access points
I believe Fernando will forgive me. For the curious,
an *unofficial* version of our work can be found here:
http://git.pavlix.net/gitweb/?p=rdnss.git;a=summary
Cheers,
Pavel
On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:37 +0300, Teemu Savolainen wrote:
Hi,
So how do we proceed from here?
Would it be
Hi,
So how do we proceed from here?
Would it be enough to discuss and agree an errata for the RFC? Doing full
RFC6106bis might be overkill.
Chairs?
Best regards,
Teemu
2012/4/27 Pavel Simerda pav...@pavlix.net
Hello,
my proposition is the same as Teemu's or very similar.
1) I propose
Hello,
my proposition is the same as Teemu's or very similar.
1) I propose to change the default Lifetime from
[MaxRtrAdvInterval, 2*MaxRtrAdvInterva] to a single
agreed-upon recommended default value. Almost nobody
would need to change this default value.
5*MaxRtrAdvInterval is IMO a good
Hello,
my proposition is the same as Teemu's or very similar.
1) I propose to change the default Lifetime from
[MaxRtrAdvInterval, 2*MaxRtrAdvInterva] to a single
agreed-upon recommended default value. Almost nobody
would need to change this default value.
5*MaxRtrAdvInterval is IMO a good
Hi,
We have seen this same problem as well.
Does anyone have any idea why the lifetime is bound with SHOULD to this
very short time period? For example, if the Lifetime == MaxRtrAdvInterval,
a host often would effectively be forced to send RS to refresh the RDNSS
information before RDNSS
Pavel,
I concur with your description of the problem.
do you have a proposal for how it can be solved?
Best regards,
Ole
On Apr 19, 2012, at 23:32 , Pavel Šimerda wrote:
Hello,
I'm starting my work on linux NetworkManager. I've been following
several bugreports during the recent months
Hello,
I'm starting my work on linux NetworkManager. I've been following
several bugreports during the recent months that all lead to problems
with maintaining the list of recursive nameservers.
I've already spent quite some time analyzing RDNSS problems and I came
to a conclusion that the
