On 12/12/2012 21:32, Ole Trøan wrote:
I think the only way to make progress on this question is to
discuss two points in a much more general way:
1. Does the current mapping of the u bit in the modified EUI format have
any value?
2. Does the current mapping of the g bit in the modified EUI
2012-12-12 18:26, Ran Atkinson ran.atkin...@gmail.com :
On 12 Dec 2012, at 12:21 , Rémi Després wrote:
Do you know any deployment with u=g=1 in this context ?
There is limited use today of IPv6 addresses that have
apparent unicast routing prefixes, but contain multicast
group IDs in
Aside: I'm departing on travel today, and will be offline
for several days. I apologise in advance for the brevity
of this note, but I lack time to write a longer note.
Earlier Brian Carpenter wrote:
I believe it's true that the u bit has no value for ILNP.
At one point there
I think the only way to make progress on this question is to
discuss two points in a much more general way:
1. Does the current mapping of the u bit in the modified EUI format have any
value?
2. Does the current mapping of the g bit in the modified EUI format have any
value?
If the answer to
2012-12-12 12:45, Brian E Carpenter brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com :
I think the only way to make progress on this question is to
discuss two points in a much more general way:
1. Does the current mapping of the u bit in the modified EUI format have
any value?
2. Does the current mapping
On Weds 12th December, Remi Despres wrote, in part:
Not sure however that the two proposed questions
are clear enough because today:
- some IIDs have u = 0, and some have u = 1,
- some IIDs have g = 0, and some have g = 1.
The only combination that isn't used is u=g=1.
While U==G==1 is
Le 2012-12-12 à 17:23, Ran Atkinson ran.atkin...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Weds 12th December, Remi Despres wrote, in part:
Not sure however that the two proposed questions
are clear enough because today:
- some IIDs have u = 0, and some have u = 1,
- some IIDs have g = 0, and some have g =
On 12 Dec 2012, at 12:21 , Rémi Després wrote:
Do you know any deployment with u=g=1 in this context ?
There is limited use today of IPv6 addresses that have
apparent unicast routing prefixes, but contain multicast
group IDs in the low-order 64-bits (IID).
Yours,
Ran
I think the only way to make progress on this question is to
discuss two points in a much more general way:
1. Does the current mapping of the u bit in the modified EUI format have
any value?
2. Does the current mapping of the g bit in the modified EUI format have
any value?
If the
