>
> > I have in the past seen firewalls that dropped some critical packets but
> > allowed others through (in one case: RS/RA were fine but ND was
> > filtered, which led to IPv4 working in 3 second spurts, i.e. until NUD
> > kicked in).
>
> That's assuming there was no link-local communication,
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 02:57:20AM -0300, Fernando Gont wrote:
> > Totally random crazy idea: could there be firewalls on some of these
> > machines that are causing multicast RAs to be filtered but unicast RAs
> > are fine (e.g. a unicast RA reply to an RS)?
>
> Not sure if "firewalls", but I c
Hi, Erik,
On 03/27/2013 04:47 AM, Erik Kline wrote:
> Privacy addresses will very likely regenerate before such timer expires.
> -- Actually, such timer shouldn't expire if you continue receiving
> RAs...
>
>
> I have in the past seen firewalls that dropped some critical packets but
