Hi,
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 09:30:22AM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> So, is there any real operational value in this, or is it just
> a case of "we did it for v4 so it must be right for v6"?
Its a nice to have IMHO.
Whats missing is an idea how to get forward and reverse DNS out to
resident
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
Yes, but we must not forget temporary addresses. If the MTA has temporary
addresses, then it will prefer them for its smtp sessions. So, one should
either disable temporaries on all MTAs or use DNS dynamic updates. I think
that it would be much wiser to
Florian Lohoff writes:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 09:30:22AM +1200, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
>> So, is there any real operational value in this, or is it just
>> a case of "we did it for v4 so it must be right for v6"?
>
> Its a nice to have IMHO.
>
> Whats missing is an idea how to get forward an
On Tue, 3 Sep 2013, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Mohacsi Janos wrote:
Yes, but we must not forget temporary addresses. If the MTA has temporary
addresses, then it will prefer them for its smtp sessions. So, one should
either disable temporaries on all MTAs or use DNS dynam
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 01:06:56PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
> I have played with the idea of implementing some sort of selv service
> for the end users, allowing them to either have their prefix delegated
> or to add a few simple *static* PTR records for specific addresses. I do
> not see any
On Sep 03, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> Mostly because it's on by default. Even if you configure a static
> address and default gw, as soon as the system sees RAs it might
> start to use SLAAC based privacy addresses for outgoing connections.
This is clearly a misconfiguration.
--
ciao,
Marco
On 03/set/2013, at 14:38, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
> On Sep 03, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>
>> Mostly because it's on by default. Even if you configure a static
>> address and default gw, as soon as the system sees RAs it might
>> start to use SLAAC based privacy addresses for outgoi
On 9/3/2013 3:46 PM, Marco Sommani wrote:
>
> On 03/set/2013, at 14:38, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
>
>> On Sep 03, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>>
>>> Mostly because it's on by default. Even if you configure a static
>>> address and default gw, as soon as the system sees RAs it might
>>> s
On 03/09/2013 13:46, Marco Sommani wrote:
> On 03/set/2013, at 14:38, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
>> On Sep 03, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
>>
>>> Mostly because it's on by default. Even if you configure a static
>>> address and default gw, as soon as the system sees RAs it might
>>> start t
If an ISP assigned a /64 to their mail server, they could assign each
customer a permanent unique IP on their MTA, perhaps hash-generated. Every
message could be traceable without the X-Authentication header. =)
Frank
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-ops-bounces+frnkblk=iname@lists.clue
10 matches
Mail list logo