You are right, it can not be Google's responsibility to fix other networks.
That being said, given initial and then monthly warnings, including a link
to a FAQ, from noreply@ to whois contacts, you would most likely help
increase IPv6 adoption.
Richard
Sent by mobile; excuse my brevity.
And in the meantime, accept that the users of that operator's network
cannot reliably reach our services?
If you were a user of that operator, I suspect you wouldn't like that. I
suspect you especially wouldn't like it if you called the operator and they
told you there were no problems, and most w
On 4/16/15 10:22 PM, Frank Habicht wrote:
Hi,
On 4/17/2015 6:45 AM, Erik Kline wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Brian E Carpenter
But the incentive is wrong. Forcing users to drop back to IPv4 offers
no incentive to fix the IPv6 problem. The correct incentive would be to
tell an operat
Hi,
On 4/17/2015 6:45 AM, Erik Kline wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Brian E Carpenter
>> But the incentive is wrong. Forcing users to drop back to IPv4 offers
>> no incentive to fix the IPv6 problem. The correct incentive would be to
>> tell an operator that they will be blacklisted un
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Brian E Carpenter
wrote:
> On 17/04/2015 15:17, Erik Kline wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
>>> On 16/04/15 01:57, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
>>>
For the avoidance of mystery: Google performs measurements of IPv6
connectivity an
On 17/04/2015 15:17, Erik Kline wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
>> On 16/04/15 01:57, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
>>
>>> For the avoidance of mystery: Google performs measurements of IPv6
>>> connectivity and latency on an ongoing basis. The Google DNS servers do
>>> not re
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 16/04/15 01:57, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
>
>> For the avoidance of mystery: Google performs measurements of IPv6
>> connectivity and latency on an ongoing basis. The Google DNS servers do
>> not return records to DNS resolvers if our meas
On 4/15/2015 8:57 PM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:56 AM, Brian E Carpenter
mailto:brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I suggest checking if any of your affected users have broken 6to4
setups,
and that you are applying the relevant mitigations in RFC 6343.
M
On 16/04/15 01:57, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
For the avoidance of mystery: Google performs measurements of IPv6
connectivity and latency on an ongoing basis. The Google DNS servers do
not return records to DNS resolvers if our measurements indicate
that for users of those resolvers, HTTP/HTTPS
