On 16.12.2015 10:33, Johannes Weber wrote:
> 1) Many DNS changes for services behind the dyn prefix (not all devices
> are able to update DNS records)
For those of you having its own authoritative DNS server (which is
recommended anyway if you want to use DNSSEC), the following tool can
help to ma
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:16:41PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> > It's not something that would work for an enterprise network, but as soon
> > as the "we need persistant addresses!" phase of denial is over, it's a great
> > solution for SoHo networks. And yes, been there, tested OpenWRT HNC
On 2015-12-16 13:09, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:01:19PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> Routing scaling research will be fun, but in the end, that is the only
>> real way to handle that situation.
>
> Dual-PA multihoming works, and has a number of extra benefits that
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 01:01:19PM +0100, Jeroen Massar wrote:
> Routing scaling research will be fun, but in the end, that is the only
> real way to handle that situation.
Dual-PA multihoming works, and has a number of extra benefits that you
cannot get with PI - like, applications can decid
On 2015-12-16 10:40, Jens Link wrote:
> Johannes Weber writes:
[..]
> 5) Use a SIXXS / HE Tunnel
Tunnel brokers (RFC3053) are transition technologies, they won't be here
forever. You likely wanted to point out commercial VPN solutions that
can provide these services just like the normal ISP who
Johannes,
I've read your blog post and i fully agree that DNS changes (dynamic
DNS) and dynamic IPv6 allocation for LAN (DHCP-PD) is a big issue.
Couple of years ago i addressed this issue and came up with a personal
solution (you can test it and use it for free if you want).
https://www.duiadn
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 10:33:29AM +0100, Johannes Weber wrote:
> what are your experiences with dynamic IPv6 prefixes? Here in Germany,
> several ISPs only offer dynamic /56 prefixes that change after a router
> reboot. Of course, for "normal" end-users this is not a problem. But for
> compan
> > 1) Many DNS changes for services behind the dyn prefix (not all devices
> > are able to update DNS records)
> > 2) Security policies with DynDNS ranges (how to allow a dyn IPv6-range
> > in other firewall policies?)
> > 3) Routing inside IPv6 VPN tunnels (solved with OSPFv3, but maybe not
> > o
Johannes Weber writes:
> what are your experiences with dynamic IPv6 prefixes? Here in Germany,
> several ISPs only offer dynamic /56 prefixes that change after a router
> reboot. Of course, for "normal" end-users this is not a problem. But for
> companies having several remote offices behind suc
Johannes Weber writes:
> 1) Many DNS changes for services behind the dyn prefix (not all devices
> are able to update DNS records)
> 2) Security policies with DynDNS ranges (how to allow a dyn IPv6-range
> in other firewall policies?)
> 3) Routing inside IPv6 VPN tunnels (solved with OSPFv3, but
Hello ipv6-ops,
what are your experiences with dynamic IPv6 prefixes? Here in Germany,
several ISPs only offer dynamic /56 prefixes that change after a router
reboot. Of course, for "normal" end-users this is not a problem. But for
companies having several remote offices behind such ISP lines,
11 matches
Mail list logo
