I can confirm that IOS (and assuming NX-OS) supports Anycast RP using PIMv6
(RFC 4610). However, I haven't tested this for Embedded RP so not sure if
that throws a curve ball. The challenge with Embedded RP is it become a new
application requirement. From the network perspective it's not a big d
Hi Benedikt,
> Hi Jim and list,
>
> first off, I've done some IPv6 multicast routing but I've never been
> unlucky enough not to deal with it over IPv4.
>
> > 1) There is no MSDPv6 and probably never will be. Of course you
> > have SSM and Embedded RP but that doesn’t cover all cases. For
ent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 2:52 PM
> To: ipv6-ops@lists.cluenet.de
> Subject: Re: Large IPv6 Multicast Domains
>
> On 04/06/2014 16:57, James Small wrote:
>
> > 1)There is no MSDPv6 and probably never will be. Of course you have SSM
> > and Embedded RP but that doesn
Wondering what you have seen with IPv6 Multicast for large networks - for
example, large multinational organizations. When looking at keeping feature
parity between IPv4 and IPv6 multicast there are two things that have jumped
out at me:
1) There is no MSDPv6 and probably never will be. Of
Hello,
I'm trying to implement consistent client prefix policies and also adhere to
RFC 6724. Windows 8/8.1 come this way by default. However, Windows Vista/7
follow the older RFC 3484 rules. To update Windows Vista/7 I came up with a
simple script. The issue is, I can't get Windows 7 to ta
Interested in what you're using to send/receive SMTP over IPv6:
A) Using (product) from __ (vendor)
B) Using (service provider or "cloud solution")
C) Elected not to implement SMTP over IPv6 at this time because
___ (reason)
All responses greatly