RE: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage

2014-02-13 Thread Jean-Francois . TremblayING
C) Because our current vendor does not support it and anti-spam is seen as mandatory within the business. /JF

RE: MTU handling in 6RD deployments

2014-01-07 Thread Jean-Francois . TremblayING
Hi Tore. Does anyone know what tricks, if any, the major 6RD deployments (ATT, Free, Swisscom, others?) are using to alleviate any problems stemming from the reduced IPv6 MTU? Some possibilities that come to mind are: * Having the 6RD CPE lower the TCP MSS value of SYN packets as they

Re: MTU handling in 6RD deployments

2014-01-07 Thread Jean-Francois . TremblayING
De : Gert Doering g...@space.net Have a higher IPv4 MTU between the 6rd tunnel endpoints sounds like a nice solution an ISP could deploy. Docsis MTU is 1518 bytes, so that won't happen any time soon in the cable world. (Docsis 3.1 is higher at 2000 bytes, but that's years away) /JF