Re: Why used DHCPv6 when RA has RDNSS and DNSSL?

Bjørn Mork writes: > This list has this in the header: > > List-Id: IPv6 operators forum > List-Unsubscribe: , > > List-Archive: >

Re: Implementation/deployment wiki for IPv6?

Jens Link writes: > If there isn't one, I can setup a (doku)wiki. As nobody else volunteered I'm going to setup a VM over the weekend. I don't mind maintaining the OS and application but I would love to get some help for administrative tasks like adding / deleting users, taki

Re: Implementation/deployment wiki for IPv6?

Brian E Carpenter writes: > Hi, > > Is anybody aware of a general implementation/deployment wiki for IPv6? If there isn't one, I can setup a (doku)wiki. Jens -- | Foelderichstr. 40 | 13595 Berlin, Germany

Re: peering AWS - DTAG

Thomas Schäfer writes: > Short version: > > 2600:9000:20ad:4e00:0:8a28:1580:93a1 is not reachable from AS3320 Hi, just talked to someone from AWS. From their side everything looks okay right now. Ping from https://f-lga1.f.de.net.dtag.de/index.php?pageid=ping also works. Jens -- --

Re: question regarding over the counter devices

Mikael Abrahamsson writes: > Let me put it this way, I have personally found an anon-ftp server with > company confidential documents on it, that was reachable from the > outside without the owners knowledge, because there was a port-forward > in the residential gateway that the owner wasn't acti

Re: question regarding over the counter devices

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ writes: Hi, > Maybe we need to look into those distributions of BSD/Linux made for > non-techie users, that come with a “build-in” GUI, etc. I doubt those > come with IPv6-enabled by default and the firewall-off, it will be a > mistake, as they try to allow the users to work

Re: macos Sierra with CGA address?

Holger Zuleger writes: > It seems that some implementation for Linux exist, and also an Windows > Application (see page 23 on > http://www.rmv6tf.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/IPv6_SeND_PPT1.pdf) And the slides lead to: https://github.com/TrustRouter/TrustRouter "TrustRouter will be available

Re: Netflix hates IPv6

Marco Davids writes: > Why doesn't NetFlix simply look at the subscriber-information instead of > doing geolocation based on IP-addresses. Why can't I buy DVDs in the US and watch them in my European DVD Player? Jens -- --

Re: Netflix hates IPv6

Robert Hosford writes: > Unless you use HE like I do. Nice Job Netflix. Why are so many people complain now? I had this discussion a couple of years back (last IETF Meeting in Berlin). HE can't guarantee that a tunnel terminating in the US is not used by someone outside the US. Netflix has

Re: Slow WiFi with Android Marshmallow & IPv6?

Gert Doering writes: > (I'm not sure about Windows and 6106 right now, so not commenting on that) I checked last week and the answer is No. Jens -- | Foelderichstr. 40 | 13595 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-187

Re: Slow WiFi with Android Marshmallow & IPv6?

"Brzozowski, John Jason" writes: > As long as we have either DHCPv6 or RFC6106 Shouldn't that be "as long as we have DHCPv6 and RFC6106"? Android does not support DHCPv6 and (AFAIK) Microsoft does not support RFC6106. So in a mixed environment you need both. Jens, who just opened a case at Ci

Re: IPv6 Dynamic Prefix Problems

Johannes Weber writes: > 1) Many DNS changes for services behind the dyn prefix (not all devices > are able to update DNS records) > 2) Security policies with DynDNS ranges (how to allow a dyn IPv6-range > in other firewall policies?) > 3) Routing inside IPv6 VPN tunnels (solved with OSPFv3, but

Re: IPv6-misconfigurations

Thomas Schäfer writes: > In case of hs worms, I phoned the webmaster, but he says he is busy and > has higher priorities. But if the server had an IPv4 problem it would be fixed within minutes. :-( Jens -- | Foelderic

Re: IPv6-misconfigurations

Thomas Schäfer writes: > Hi, > > I am observing sometimes very strange ipv6-misconfigurations. My theory: People enable IPv6 for a service, test it and when it works forget about it. Many times they forget to monitor services and don't notice that the service is not working anymore. Or there are

Re: iOS9 launch and T-Mobile DE IPv6

Dominik Bay writes: > Group, > > as you might be aware, T-Mobile DE recently dual-stacked their network. > This is working absolutely fine on Windows Phone and Android so far, > kudos for that. Aggree. On some devices even tethering is working with IPv6. (I tried MOTO G2 and Nexus 10). Jens -

Re: Cost of IPv6 for IT operations team

Benedikt Stockebrand writes: > And yes, back in 95 there were allegedly people testing the hardware > they bought for being year 2000 compliant:-) Back in '99 my employer send me to an Oracle training. I do not remember much about Oracle but I do remember one quote from the trainer: "I told my

Re: Cost of IPv6 for IT operations team

Jens Hoffmann writes: > PS: SCNR: "English is not part of the unions description of my job." They didn't have a job. They trained to get one. Jens -- | Foelderichstr. 40 | 13595 Berlin, Germany | +49-151-

Re: Cost of IPv6 for IT operations team

Andy Davidson writes: > Stage one - write v6 support requirements into RFP for equipment before > you plan to turn it on. That should have started a couple of years ago. About a year ago I did some IPv6 training for a customer. They just bought a very expensive commercial cloud solution (BULLS

Re: Cost of IPv6 for IT operations team

Ted Mittelstaedt writes: sorry for the delayed answer. I was quite busy doing non IPv6 stuff ;-) > Kind of like you drafted Billy Joe Bob from Hayseed to troubleshoot your > 2015 Chevy Volt and it extended the time troubleshooting because he's > still looking for the carburetor. This pretty muc

Re: Cost of IPv6 for IT operations team

Jared Mauch writes: >> You have at least two addresses to configure, which leads to two DNS >> records, two services to be monitored, more firewall rules, ... And in >> the end more things to document. > > This sure is true in an environment where humans are still the gating factor > in se

Re: Cost of IPv6 for IT operations team

Ted Mittelstaedt writes: > But as for operations costs, I would say, zero I don't agree. In a dual-stacked environment there is more work to do. 1. Setting up Servers (and Services) You have at least two addresses to configure, which leads to two DNS records, two services to be monitore

Re: 6to4 in Internet aaaa records

Ca By writes: > 1. Only make records from 2000::/3 > 2. Do not make records with 6to4 addresses > 3. Do no make records with NAT64 WKP 64:ff9b::/96 ( saw this > last week ) Last time I checked I found these interesting records while checking Alexa top 1 million domains: 2 UNIQUE

AAAA records (was: Re: IPv6 packets with HBH)

Fernando Gont writes: Hi, > This is the current state of affairs on the public IPv6 Internet: > After reading slide 7 I decided to take a closer look at those "funny" IPv6 addresses. I used host to get AAA

Re: IPv6 Assignment for Server

"Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" writes: > If you have one server per LAN, then it is perfectly OK to use one / > 64 per server. If you think about that, currently you use a /32 for > IPv4 address :-) You are currently wasting more space (4 billion > times more) I think that depends on what kind of serve

Re: Poll on SMTP over IPv6 Usage

"James Small" writes: > Interested in what you’re using to send/receive SMTP over IPv6: > > A) Using (product) from __ (vendor) postfix on Debian Jens -- | Foelderichstr. 40 | 13595 Berlin, Germany

Re: RFC 5952 converter tool

Leo Vegoda writes: > Hi, > > Can anyone recommend a library or other tool, preferably open source, > that can take non-RFC 5952 formatted IPv6 addresses and convert them to > a compliant format? For python http://docs.python.org/dev/library/ipaddress should do the trick: #!/usr/bin/python from

Re: PTR records for IPv6

Frank Habicht writes: > not for a mail server. do these OSs have an MTA running by default? > part of proper MTA installation would be to change that default behaviour. Isn't there a Mac Mini "Server" running OSX? If only seen on once and my guess would be that most admins don't know and don't c

Re: teredo.ipv6.microsoft.com off?

Enno Rey writes: Hi, > There's quite some debate which approach to use due to operational > practices and MS telling people "not to 'fully' disable IPv6 as you > might lose support for $SYSTEM". I'm still looking for a source too. Rumors have it that the Windows 7 roll out here (large enterpri

Re: teredo.ipv6.microsoft.com off?

Jens Link writes: as I like to talk to myself >> There's quite some debate which approach to use due to operational >> practices and MS telling people "not to 'fully' disable IPv6 as you >> might lose support for $SYSTEM". >

Re: teredo.ipv6.microsoft.com off?

Jeroen Massar writes: > Windows boxes that are in an Active Domain (which should match your > 'enterprise net') have Teredo and 6to4 disabled per default. Sure about that? IIRC this depends on the Windows version. And I think I have seen Win 2008R2 Servers within an AD, with at least 6to4 enable