On 15/06/2016 16:13, Michael Oghia wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
>
>> On 15/06/2016 15:57, Michael Oghia wrote:
>>
>> If HE started dishing out tunnels this week, maybe it could be addressed,
>> script/database changes to ensure
On 15/06/2016 15:57, Michael Oghia wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> While following this thread, it occurred to me that one issue not being
> discussed is Netflix's encouragement to revert to IPv4. Of course, that is
> fairly easy with NAT, but the principle is one that makes me feel very
> uncomfortable
blocking us is
just a slap in the face.
Thanks,
Robert
-Original Message-
From: ipv6-ops-bounces+rhosford=certifiednets@lists.cluenet.de
[mailto:ipv6-ops-bounces+rhosford=certifiednets....@lists.cluenet.de]
On Behalf Of Noel Butler
Sent: Sunday, June 12, 2016 11:04 PM
To: ipv6-ops@list
On 13/06/2016 06:46, Robert Hosford wrote:
Unless you use HE like I do. Nice Job Netflix.
Robert
Do you use HE tunnel? or native ipv6? netflix are blocking HE
tunnelbroker services because of fun police copyright cops narky about
geoblock avoidance, why should you pay the same cheap p
Hi Gert,
On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 10:54 +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:45:33PM +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
> > We block only by IP from whatever spam source is used (4, or 6), and
> > rbldnsd handles ipv6 nicely (albeit in /64's - fair enou
On 19/02/2014 14:29, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 02/18/2014 07:55 PM, SM wrote:
> Hi Doug, At 17:52 18-02-2014, Doug Barton wrote: My point is that all the
> hooha about "We can't do mail over IPv6 because we can't do IP address
> reputation" seems to be nonsense. There are plenty of ways to do
On 14/02/2014 06:23, James Small wrote:
> Interested in what you're using to send/receive SMTP over IPv6:
>
> A) Using (product) from __ (vendor)
postfix from source on slackware
