On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 02:12:31PM +, Phil Mayers wrote:
> As above, depends on how they're using the socket API. As a rule for
> UDP connections, you actually have to put *more* work in to see ICMP
> errors. It's certainly possible to ignore them.
FWIW, at least on Linux, if you keep doing se
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 08:42:00PM +, Anfinsen, Ragnar wrote:
> I am working with my management team to implement IPv6, but I got an
> interesting question from one of the managers; Why do we need more IPv4 if
> we are moving towards IPv6?
Maybe because the move is going too slowly?
Case in
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 06:44:11PM +0200, Andrew ? Yourtchenko wrote:
> The standards' purpose is to facilitate the interoperability.
>
> "MLD snooping" happens within a single device.
What about the interaction between switches and the machines?
All interoperability is not about inter-switch/-r
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 04:31:22PM +0200, Enno Rey wrote:
> to be honest, as another security person, I'm not really sure about the
> benefit of uRPF in the IPv6 world, in some scenarios.
> imagine a single infected smartphone on LTE, generating connections with
> potentially 2^64 different source
2013/4/19 Dick Visser :
> Cisco says it's not supported on any platform.
I'm fairly certain I've done this on 2901.
/* Steinar */
--
Software Engineer, Google Switzerland
