Re: [ipxe-devel] Non-ISO Diskless Boot - Pointers?

2014-01-11 Thread Jarrod Johnson
You can look at xcat.sf.net. xCAT does diskless clients for centos, suse, and others. It boots things mostly into ramdisk. Has some complicated options to balance persistence versus stateless, memory usage versus nfs access, etc. On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Richard Hornbaker wrote: > Hi,

Re: [ipxe-devel] Create a new port ipxe from gpxe in FreeBSD 10.0

2014-01-11 Thread Andrzej Tobola
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 03:24:16PM -0500, Pccom Frank wrote: > Hi, Developers! > > I found an old port in FreeBSD 9.2, that is net/gpxe. > > It is broken because gcc is no longer available in FreeBSD 10.0. > > Any body has interest to make a new port ipxe in FreeBSD? > > I do not know how to do

[ipxe-devel] Create a new port ipxe from gpxe in FreeBSD 10.0

2014-01-11 Thread Pccom Frank
Hi, Developers! I found an old port in FreeBSD 9.2, that is net/gpxe. It is broken because gcc is no longer available in FreeBSD 10.0. Any body has interest to make a new port ipxe in FreeBSD? I do not know how to do it but I can provide testing help. Thanks! __

Re: [ipxe-devel] Any body help me to compile ipxe on FreeBSD?

2014-01-11 Thread Jiri B
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:09:22AM -0500, Pccom Frank wrote: > I do not want to compile ipxe on LInux then copy to my FreeBSD every time. Search archives, I posted link to OpenBSD port of iPXE. Modify it to fit FreeBSD style... There should be not big difference in ports logic. jirib

[ipxe-devel] Any body help me to compile ipxe on FreeBSD?

2014-01-11 Thread Pccom Frank
I do not want to compile ipxe on LInux then copy to my FreeBSD every time. The newest FreeBSD has no gcc as default. The default cc is clang. I have installed gcc-4.6.4. But when I which gcc, it says command not found. When I which cc, it found at /usr/bin/cc which clang, it says /usr/bin/clang.

Re: [ipxe-devel] Choosing Output Channels dynamicly? [ was Re: making ipxe silent]

2014-01-11 Thread SAL
Hello, On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 12:08:36AM +0100, Michael Brown wrote: > On 10/01/14 13:37, Oliver Rath wrote: > >It is possible, to select, which output channel is taken? I assume not > >yet, but this seems also useful (like stderr & stdout in linux). > > > >If not, I could imagine three ways to d