On Wednesday, November 10, 2010 06:19:35 pm you wrote:
> On Saturday 06 Nov 2010 04:31:06 Huan Truong wrote:
> > We have reverted to `dhcp-multi' and the problem still persists.
> >
> > So it has to be some time earlier than that. We're currently
> > investigating/bisecting in the hope of finding
On Saturday 06 Nov 2010 04:31:06 Huan Truong wrote:
> We have reverted to `dhcp-multi' and the problem still persists.
>
> So it has to be some time earlier than that. We're currently
> investigating/bisecting in the hope of finding out the problem. One
> thing that we know for sure is gpxe 1.0.1
On Saturday 06 Nov 2010 03:03:22 Joshua Oreman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Huan Truong wrote:
> > I'm using iPXE now and it is very apparent that iPXE tg3 implementation
> > is very slow.
> >
> > It takes me about 30 seconds to fetch my vmlinuz kernel image from
> > Ubuntu 10.10 on a
Ok,...
We have reverted to `dhcp-multi' and the problem still persists.
So it has to be some time earlier than that. We're currently
investigating/bisecting in the hope of finding out the problem. One
thing that we know for sure is gpxe 1.0.1 doesn't have that problem. It
was released on 6/29.
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Huan Truong wrote:
> I'm using iPXE now and it is very apparent that iPXE tg3 implementation
> is very slow.
>
> It takes me about 30 seconds to fetch my vmlinuz kernel image from
> Ubuntu 10.10 on a 1Gbps connection compared to gPXE (1.0.1)'s
> implementation that
Also I noticed that my 3com card is unaffected by whatever the bug is.
So I suppose it has to have something to do with either gigabit
ethernet, or tg3 implementation.
I'm using iPXE now and it is very apparent that iPXE tg3 implementation
is very slow.
It takes me about 30 seconds to fetch my vmlinuz kernel image from
Ubuntu 10.10 on a 1Gbps connection compared to gPXE (1.0.1)'s
implementation that takes about 1 second.
It prints out a bunch of hashes and som
7 matches
Mail list logo
