Nick
Here are some dandy pictures to back up the part about the aurora
http://komonews.com/weather/scotts-weather-blog/epic-northern-light-shows-dazzles-puget-sound-region
Bruce
On 5/8/2016 8:18 PM, Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
I understand the aurora borealis was quite impressive. So were the
I understand the aurora borealis was quite impressive. So were the
clouds here. As for DX, not impressive at all.
best wishes,
Nick
___
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Be sure to
:Product: Geophysical Alert Message wwv.txt
:Issued: 2016 May 09 0030 UTC
# Prepared by the US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center
#
# Geophysical Alert Message
#
Solar-terrestrial indices for 08 May follow.
Solar flux 84 and estimated planetary A-index 70.
The
:Product: Geophysical Alert Message wwv.txt
:Issued: 2016 May 08 1805 UTC
# Prepared by the US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction Center
#
# Geophysical Alert Message
#
Solar-terrestrial indices for 07 May follow.
Solar flux 88 and estimated planetary A-index 10.
The
Not to worry Michael. It's made me think a little outside the box
myself, though having ideas and putting them into practice seem to be
two different things.
I feel that the FLG-100 should be at the antenna for best results, no
argument. Although Wellbrook suggests a maximum of 100 meter
Michael: What's the distance from the antenna midpoint to the shack?
Cheers!
Mark Durenberger mobile
-Original Message-
From: Michael Yule
Sent: Sunday, May 08, 2016 7:31 AM
To: irca@hard-core-dx.com
Subject: Re: [IRCA] DKAZ Construction
Thanks Mark and Nick for getting back to me
Thanks Mark and Nick for getting back to me with really valuable help.
Despite appearances I really would like to make this as simple as possible.
My thought was that in Mark's document it is noted that the null pot works
best at the antenna (your assessment of my thought on this was right, Mark),
