Saul, First of all a big "Thank You" is in order for your efforts. Even though this is new territory for you, I think you are doing very well.
Second, when you ask about earlier loggings of CFFX 960 Kingston, I can quite happily say that I have heard them a few times from my home in Troy, Michigan. If you need more precise data, I can refer to my current logbook which I started in 1999. 73 my friend, and Happy New Year Joe --- Saul Chernos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I should give some background as far as QSLs and > CFFX are concerned. The > station is doing us a favour. The station had > received an e-mail from > someone else, and the engineer was sitting on it, > when I contacted him, by > chance, by telephone. The engineer was extremely > friendly, and explained > that he had the request on file, but has been VERY > busy overseeing the > transition of 960 to 104.3. He was concerned about > the number of reports > he'd receive adding to an already very difficult > workload. I explained that > our BCB test committee could handle the responses, > if he wished, and also > supply test material. He took us up on this, and has > been very nice to deal > with. Soon afterwards, he expressed the desire to > see the reports and > respond. We talked a bit about the report's he'd had > from Europe, and my > guess is that he appreciated hearing from us DXers > because he cared about > his signal. Anyhow, we'll get him the cards, or > whatever it is that a BCB TC > volunteer is designing (I've seen a mock-up, very > nice) as we speak. The > only experience I've had with QSLing a DX test in > this cyber-age was last > year's MT DX test on 750. It came via e-mail, as an > attachment, and is > treasured in my DX files. I don't collect QSLs > anymore (used to) but I > landed this one simply as a matter of course after > seeking to confirm music > and other test content that I'd heard. The eQSL sure > looks real to me, and > has found it's way into my age-old QSL paper file. > Anyhow, I really want to > respect the CE's original wishes, and his clearly > stated concerns. I want to > make this as easy on him as possible, simply as a > matter of respect. We're > finalizing details on how the QSLing will be done, > but my plan is to ask > that reports be sent to BOTH of us, so that if he > wants out and/or gets > busy, I can take over, and so that I can > double-check for any reports that > might appear suspect. Folks, we're dealing in this > case with an engineer who > is doing us a favour at the very moment he will be > busy ... a scant few > hours after the test, he will be turning off 960 and > relying solely on his > FM to carry the station forward. Anyhow, I need to > work out some QSL > logistics with the test committee. This is new > territory for me. If there's > something any of you feel should be done, and it > isn't being done, then > don't just complain -- offer some kind of help - big > or small, your time, > technical advice/help, actual resources, whatever - > to help get it done. > > I'm not the list moderator, but I do ask that we > move the discussion to > something more useful. I'm curious -- who has > previously heard CFFX, and > where? > > Saul > > > _______________________________________________ > The NRC AM mailing list > nrcdxas.org > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping _______________________________________________ IRCA mailing list IRCA@hard-core-dx.com http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com