https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/els/reports/STA_Print.cfm?mode=initialapplication_seq=30515RequestTimeout=1000
This is the application BAE filed in July, 2005, for
operation at Ft.
A. P. Hill for 10 kW on 590, 1020, and 1600. It was
denied/dismissed
``Location: Bowling
I was saddened, but not too surprised, to read this morning that
someone was denigrating whoever inquired of the FCC as to the source
of the tone testing that many of us have been monitoring. The
complainer's statements pretty well boiled down to the contention
that we shouldn't be
Thanks, John, for your comments.
I hate to get involved in such disagreements, but, I wanted to let you
know that I agree with you. Had I enough qualitative and accurate
information, I would have gone to the commission, as well, at first
probably through my local or NY field offices, since I
I was saddened, but not too surprised, to read this morning that
someone was denigrating whoever inquired of the FCC as to the source
of the tone testing that many of us have been monitoring. The
complainer's statements pretty well boiled down to the contention
that we shouldn't be
Several people have mentioned Kent Winrich and others who are posting on the
AF list. Can someone provide more information on this e-mail list?
Les Rayburn, director
High Noon Film
100 Centerview Drive Suite 111
Birmingham, AL 35216
205.824.8930
205.824.8960 Fax
205.253.4867 Cell
list for the International Radio Club of America
Subject: Re: [IRCA] FCC info on tone testers
Simple question: As an engineer, would you prefer the listener go
directly
to the FCC or contact you first?
Craig Healy
Providence, RI
___
IRCA mailing list
It seems to me that a lot of people posting on this subject are making
assumptions -- because they have to given the paucity of reliable
and/or verifiable public info.
I don't believe that anyone has, so far, based on what has been posted,
gone to the FCC painting themselves as a DX'er. Glenn
I understand what you are saying, Craig. The obvious answer is that, of
course, I would prefer they coming to me first. But, the answer in the
case of the tone stations is not so cut and dry.
If someone had a complaint against WNTP or WFIL, they would be able to
contact us, as our call
Similarly, how is it better or worse for one person to presume illegal
activity based on clear and obvious willful interference and no
identification as versus another person to presume that everything is
legal based solely on one rather fragmented post claiming that was so.
I would also ask
--- Craig Healy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would also ask just what business any in here have to lodge a
complaint?
*** Maybe I missed something here, but I'm not aware that any DX'ers
have said that they had complained to the FCC. In fact I don't recall
anyone other than broadcasters on
Met fellow thru the business, late 80s, became friendly. Works for FCC.
Invited us to visit his home tour FCC monitoring site. We keep in touch,
trading
intercepts over years. He moves to FL, as do we. He moves to CA, as do we
briefly. As w/many FCC 'line officers', he enjoys DXng ute
Dear Mr Miller: Would you please identify the source (location,
licensee and any other available info) of the continuous tone tests
which were running on 1610 kHz last week, and then on 1020 kHz
Saturday? Numerous listeners have heard them, and they seem to come
from somewhere along the
12 matches
Mail list logo
