Re: [IRCA] Ground radials was New receiver ground

2007-08-12 Thread Charles A Taylor
At 11:29 PM 8/11/2007 -0400, you wrote: >To change the subject a little bit, how about using counterpoise radials >instead of ground rods? You can lay the wire on the ground or bury by >just covering it. What are the pros and cons of using radials instead >of ground rods? How about using both of t

Re: [IRCA] Ground radials was New receiver ground

2007-08-12 Thread Patrick Martin
Craig, Unfortunately I don't have the room to run longer radials on the ground and leave them. People could trip over them easily. When mine are is at the base of the vertical going down the slope of a bank. They work, but I am sure if I could makje them 45' each, it would make a difference. But t

Re: [IRCA] Ground radials was New receiver ground

2007-08-12 Thread Craig Healy
> I have used ground radials, over 120 of them for my vertical. They are > 5-8 feet long and lay on top of the ground. They do work, The radials > can have a directional pattern too. I still like burying my ground > system though. Also under the same tree I have 8-10 five foot ground > rods (copper

Re: [IRCA] Ground radials was New receiver ground

2007-08-12 Thread Patrick Martin
Bill, I have used ground radials, over 120 of them for my vertical. They are 5-8 feet long and lay on top of the ground. They do work, The radials can have a directional pattern too. I still like burying my ground system though. Also under the same tree I have 8-10 five foot ground rods (copper pi

[IRCA] Ground radials was New receiver ground

2007-08-11 Thread Bill Harms
To change the subject a little bit, how about using counterpoise radials instead of ground rods? You can lay the wire on the ground or bury by just covering it. What are the pros and cons of using radials instead of ground rods? How about using both of them at the same time. I use radials for