Re: [IRCA] KNBR-940

2007-02-07 Thread Michael Hawkins
KGO is on the Newark side of the Dumbarton Bridge, virtually surrounded by water. KNBR is in Belmont, just east of US 101. They are about 10-12 miles apart. I live in Campbell, just southwest of San Jose. While both stations are very strong there, there is no interaction between them an

Re: [IRCA] KNBR-940

2007-02-07 Thread Marty Rimpau
Hi Glen, k g o's transmitter site is by the Dumbarton bridge, and I believe that is in Newark California, and the knbr transmitter site is in Bellmont, I do believe, but I had heard it was by the San Francisco international airport, but maybe I'm confusing them with k g e i on short wave. On Wed,

Re: [IRCA] KNBR-940

2007-02-07 Thread Michael Hawkins
Glenn, I think you're right. KGO is strong enough here (8 miles directly north, over water, in their beam) that they take out 800 and 820 and still heavily distort 790 and 830. I am also about 10 miles SSE of KNBR with their 50KW ND antenna. Needless to say, there's a bunch of non-exist

Re: [IRCA] KNBR-940

2007-02-07 Thread Russ Edmunds
--- Glenn Hauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > KNBR on 940 would be a leapfrog mixing product, as I like to call > them On SW, > of 680 over KGO 810, a further 130 kHz. Are the KGO and KNBR sites > close enough > to interact? It could be an external mixing product, not necessarily > receiver-produ

Re: [IRCA] KNBR-940

2007-02-07 Thread Glenn Hauser
KNBR on 940 would be a leapfrog mixing product, as I like to call them On SW, of 680 over KGO 810, a further 130 kHz. Are the KGO and KNBR sites close enough to interact? It could be an external mixing product, not necessarily receiver-produced front-end overload. 73, Glenn Hauser, OK _