At 07:46 PM 6/5/2007 -0400, you wrote:
>Charles A Taylor wrote:
>
> > My 10-W TIS postings may be a bit exotic out there, but
> > PRACTICALLY WORTHLESS.
> >
> > HELP PLEASE!
> >
> > Prissy Chuck
> >
>
>Dear Prissy Pants,
>
> With regards to TIS and HAR stations and your commentAHEM!
>
>
Charles A Taylor wrote:
> My 10-W TIS postings may be a bit exotic out there, but
> PRACTICALLY WORTHLESS.
>
> HELP PLEASE!
>
> Prissy Chuck
>
Dear Prissy Pants,
With regards to TIS and HAR stations and your commentAHEM!
Sincerely, Doc
__
They look fine here, Charlie.
Marc DeLorenzo
South Dennis, MA
-- Original message --
From: Charles A Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> TO EVERYONE READING THIS POSTIN, are you seeing my DX postings as
> being all cockamamy in justification (in how they line up line
> TO EVERYONE READING THIS POSTIN, are you seeing my
> DX postings as
> being all cockamamy in justification (in how they
> line up line-by-
> line)?
> HELP PLEASE!
Mr. Charles,
I know you mean very well, as you are meticulous about
your postings, about how they written as well the
format. On
--- Charles A Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
> TO EVERYONE READING THIS POSTIN, are you seeing my DX postings as
> being all cockamamy in justification (in how they line up line-by-
> line)?
>
*** I have no problem with DX loggings. But 200 or so posts of mostly
speculation and opinio
At 10:18 AM 6/4/2007 -0700, you wrote:
>Chuck and Paul,
>
>I hear you. If we want more interesting e mails, we have to post them.
>More variety is the spice of life. Apparently a lot of people have been
>interested in the KOHI thread, or it would be here. But like anything,
>it will run its cours
