The following application is to make official what we all know -
CBU-690 Vancouver BC will remain on the air, with a new Vancouver FM transmitter
on 88.1 MHz, 8.9 kW, 567.2 meters:

<http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Notices/2008/pb2008-59.htm>

Vancouver, British Columbia
Application No. 2008-0840-5

Application by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) to amend the licence
of the radio programming undertaking CBU Vancouver, British Columbia.

The licensee proposes to add an FM transmitter at Vancouver to broadcast its programming service Radio One originating from CBU Vancouver in order to adequately
serve the population of Vancouver.

The transmitter would operate on the frequency 88.1 MHz (channel 201C) with an average effective radiated power of 8,900 watts (maximum effective radiated power
19,500 watts/effective antenna height of 567.2 metres).

The Commission notes that it approved in part an application for an FM radio programming undertaking at Vancouver in Broadcasting Decision CRTC 2008-117, Licensing of new radio stations to serve the Vancouver radio market (Decision 2008-117). As part of the decision, the Commission denied the CBC’s request to operate an FM transmitter on Gabriola Island as well as the application to amend the broadcasting licence for CBCV-FM Victoria, to add an FM transmitter to serve Nanaimo.

The Commission further decided that the CBC should maintain the operation of its AM frequency in Vancouver to ensure effective coverage in outlying areas.

The proposed technical parameters would be the same as those authorized
in Decision CRTC 2008-117.

The CBC is seeking to amend the authority for the radio programming undertaking
granted in Decision 2008-117, into a transmitter of CBU Vancouver.
The CBC would maintain the AM undertaking CBU and add an FM transmitter
to address coverage deficiencies in Vancouver.

73,

Deane McIntyre VE6BPO
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@hard-core-dx.com
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@hard-core-dx.com

Reply via email to