Re: [Ironpython-users] Kinect and IronPython via Sho

2011-06-17 Thread Sumit Basu
Hi Jeff, we do want to move to 2.7, but as you surmised it's complex :) I'll post here when we know for sure what's happening on that front. Ps: thanks Curt for the shout-out! -Sumit -Original Message- From: ironpython-users-bounces+sumitb=microsoft@python.org [mailto:ironpython-

Re: [Ironpython-users] Kinect and IronPython via Sho

2011-06-17 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hmm, looks like Sho is still on 2.6. I wonder if they plan on upgrading ... or if they even can (2.6.2 was the last MS release). - Jeff On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Curt Hagenlocher wrote: > Very cool: > http://blogs.msdn.com/b/the_blog_of_sho/archive/2011/06/16/connecting-to-kinect-from-sho

Re: [Ironpython-users] IronPython 2.7.1 Beta coming this weekend

2011-06-17 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Markus Schaber wrote: > Ok. But at least you should update the FileVersion then, or give some > other visible indicator that allows at least manual diagnostics which > version actually is installed. Oh, of course! Only AssemblyVersion will remain the same. > >>

[Ironpython-users] Kinect and IronPython via Sho

2011-06-17 Thread Curt Hagenlocher
Very cool: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/the_blog_of_sho/archive/2011/06/16/connecting-to-kinect-from-sho.aspx -Curt ___ Ironpython-users mailing list Ironpython-users@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/ironpython-users

Re: [Ironpython-users] IronPython 2.7.1 Beta coming this weekend

2011-06-17 Thread Markus Schaber
Hi, Jeff, > Von: Jeff Hardy [mailto:jdha...@gmail.com] > On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Markus Schaber software.com> wrote: > > Fine, I'm looking forward to it. Is this release still compileable > > using .NET 2.0? > > It should be, although I haven't tested that lately. Fine. > >> The mai

Re: [Ironpython-users] IronPython 2.7.1 Beta coming this weekend

2011-06-17 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Markus Schaber wrote: > Fine, I'm looking forward to it. Is this release still compileable using > .NET 2.0? It should be, although I haven't tested that lately. > >> The main reason for this release is to get the newly supported modules >> (unicodedata, _ast, c