Re: [Ironpython-users] High-priority 2.7.1 issues

2011-06-21 Thread Dino Viehland
Also related to 30312 and version number issues in general - it looks like sys.version_info should be updated to be 2.7.1. > -Original Message- > From: ironpython-users-bounces+dinov=microsoft@python.org > [mailto:ironpython-users-bounces+dinov=microsoft@python.org] On > Behalf Of

Re: [Ironpython-users] IronPython 2.7.1 Beta coming this weekend

2011-06-21 Thread Zachary Gramana
On 6/20/2011 11:53 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote: Yes, but I think everyone chooses the same path you do (rebuild/resign). At least, I'm pretty sure that's what Resolver One does (I don't know of any other apps ... maybe we need a "Who's Using?" page). SharpDevelop does the same as well. Not to mention

Re: [Ironpython-users] IronPython 2.7.1 Beta coming this weekend

2011-06-21 Thread Slide
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Markus Schaber wrote: > Hi, Jeff, > > > > For embedding, I would recommend you continue what you're doing - it's > > just just straight-up safer. It's a shame zipimport doesn't work; we > could > > cut the deployed size of the stdlib down significantly. > > Hmm.

[Ironpython-users] IronPython, Daily Digest 6/20/2011

2011-06-21 Thread no_reply
Hi ironpython, Here's your Daily Digest of new issues for project "IronPython". In today's digest:ISSUES 1. [New comment] Chaining LINQ calls fails 2. [New comment] Chaining LINQ calls fails 3. [Status update] IronPython building against SL4 (from CodePlex) 4. [Status update] Internal changeset