Re: [Ironpython-users] Differences with pyc-compiled assemblies?

2012-11-11 Thread Vernon Cole
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Nicholas Devenish wrote: > > On 11 Nov 2012, at 23:06, Jeff Hardy wrote: > > SQLAlchemy works on IronPython? I didn't know that. Very cool. Is > > there anything that has to be done or does it just work out of the > > box? > > It's supposed to work out of the box

Re: [Ironpython-users] Differences with pyc-compiled assemblies?

2012-11-11 Thread Nicholas Devenish
On 11 Nov 2012, at 23:06, Jeff Hardy wrote: > SQLAlchemy works on IronPython? I didn't know that. Very cool. Is > there anything that has to be done or does it just work out of the > box? It's supposed to work out of the box - one of the reasons I decided to go with IronPython for my current pr

Re: [Ironpython-users] Differences with pyc-compiled assemblies?

2012-11-11 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Nicholas Devenish wrote: > I'm seeing weird differences between importing plain packages and adding > references to the compiled versions. Specifically, between importing > sqlalchemy (0.7.9, from tarball, also 0.8.0b1) as a directory structure and > as compile

[Ironpython-users] Differences with pyc-compiled assemblies?

2012-11-11 Thread Nicholas Devenish
I'm seeing weird differences between importing plain packages and adding references to the compiled versions. Specifically, between importing sqlalchemy (0.7.9, from tarball, also 0.8.0b1) as a directory structure and as compiled, the uncompiled version works perfectly, whereas the compiled vers