+1 for these plans! I think this split will be good for the dlr, which
hasn't (so far) been used as much as it could.
BTW, (and this is a small point) even though IronRuby is dead and was
never complete, it is still functional for some purposes. So, if it is
possible without major time commitments
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi, Jeff,
>
> Good work, I'm all in favour of it. Splitting DLR, IronPython and IronRuby
> into different projects is a good thing.
>
> Just some unordered thoughts:
>
> The python standard library could be fetched by the build script dire
