On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Keith Rome wrote:
> With the announcement today of .NET Foundation "umbrella" for all of
> Microsoft's open-sourced products, I am curious about what distinguishes
> the DLR/IronLanguages work from some of these others? Is it simply
> forgotten about by Microsoft
On 4 Apr 2014, at 10:39, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> I am having a hard time figuring out what the point of the .NET Foundation
> is, though, other than "advancing the conversation". I tought they tried this
> once with the CodePlex/Outercurve foundation and it didn't go anywhere.
>
If I’ve read the
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Keith Rome wrote:
> With the announcement today of .NET Foundation "umbrella" for all of
> Microsoft's open-sourced products, I am curious about what distinguishes
> the DLR/IronLanguages work from some of these others? Is it simply
> forgotten about by Microsoft
With the announcement today of .NET Foundation "umbrella" for all of
Microsoft's open-sourced products, I am curious about what distinguishes the
DLR/IronLanguages work from some of these others? Is it simply forgotten about
by Microsoft, or is there some other reason it is left out as a black s