Re: [Ironpython-users] .NET Foundation

2014-04-04 Thread Pawel Jasinski
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Keith Rome wrote: > With the announcement today of .NET Foundation "umbrella" for all of > Microsoft's open-sourced products, I am curious about what distinguishes > the DLR/IronLanguages work from some of these others? Is it simply > forgotten about by Microsoft

Re: [Ironpython-users] .NET Foundation

2014-04-04 Thread Nicholas Devenish
On 4 Apr 2014, at 10:39, Jeff Hardy wrote: > I am having a hard time figuring out what the point of the .NET Foundation > is, though, other than "advancing the conversation". I tought they tried this > once with the CodePlex/Outercurve foundation and it didn't go anywhere. > If I’ve read the

Re: [Ironpython-users] .NET Foundation

2014-04-04 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:25 PM, Keith Rome wrote: > With the announcement today of .NET Foundation "umbrella" for all of > Microsoft's open-sourced products, I am curious about what distinguishes > the DLR/IronLanguages work from some of these others? Is it simply > forgotten about by Microsoft

[Ironpython-users] .NET Foundation

2014-04-03 Thread Keith Rome
With the announcement today of .NET Foundation "umbrella" for all of Microsoft's open-sourced products, I am curious about what distinguishes the DLR/IronLanguages work from some of these others? Is it simply forgotten about by Microsoft, or is there some other reason it is left out as a black s