On 6/20/2011 11:53 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
Yes, but I think everyone chooses the same path you do
(rebuild/resign). At least, I'm pretty sure that's what Resolver One
does (I don't know of any other apps ... maybe we need a "Who's
Using?" page).
SharpDevelop does the same as well. Not to mention
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Markus Schaber
wrote:
> Hi, Jeff,
>
>
> > For embedding, I would recommend you continue what you're doing - it's
> > just just straight-up safer. It's a shame zipimport doesn't work; we
> could
> > cut the deployed size of the stdlib down significantly.
>
> Hmm.
Hi, Vernon,
Von: Vernon Cole
We Ubuntu users are still very inconvenienced by that quick "we don't build"
answer. Thanks for fixing the builder so that I can _try_ to home-build a .NET
2 version. After killing and reinstalling my Ubuntu system, I gave up trying
to actually accomplish it. It r
Hi, Jeff,
> Von: Jeff Hardy [mailto:jdha...@gmail.com]
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Markus Schaber software.com> wrote:
> > Are there no 3rd-party applications which embed and install
IronPython
> > with their own installer?
> >
> > Being afraid of such scenarios was the main reason why we
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:18 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Slide wrote:
> > I didn't see an issue filed for the zimport missing, am I just missing it
> in
> > the bug tracker?
>
> http://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/391
>
> Yikes, that's a low number, and high vot
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Slide wrote:
> I didn't see an issue filed for the zimport missing, am I just missing it in
> the bug tracker?
http://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/391
Yikes, that's a low number, and high votes.
Anybody want to tackle this one? I've got a big sack of interne
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Markus Schaber
> wrote:
> > Are there no 3rd-party applications which embed and install IronPython
> > with their own installer?
> >
> > Being afraid of such scenarios was the main reason why we build
> > Iron
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Vernon Cole wrote:
> We Ubuntu users are still very inconvenienced by that quick "we don't build"
> answer. Thanks for fixing the builder so that I can _try_ to home-build a
> .NET 2 version. After killing and reinstalling my Ubuntu system, I gave up
> trying to a
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Jimmy Schementi wrote:
>
> Jeff, do you know what's blocking zipimport from working?
Well, zipimport is a C module in CPython. There is a pure-Python
version[1], but I've never tried it. Now that zlib is supported it
should work fine.
- Jeff
[1] http://code.goog
On Jun 20, 2011, at 11:53 AM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
>
> For embedding, I would recommend you continue what you're doing - it's
> just just straight-up safer. It's a shame zipimport doesn't work; we
> could cut the deployed size of the stdlib down significantly.
How about pre-compiling your python fi
We Ubuntu users are still very inconvenienced by that quick "we don't build"
answer. Thanks for fixing the builder so that I can _try_ to home-build a
.NET 2 version. After killing and reinstalling my Ubuntu system, I gave up
trying to actually accomplish it. It requires installing a second versio
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Markus Schaber
wrote:
> Are there no 3rd-party applications which embed and install IronPython
> with their own installer?
>
> Being afraid of such scenarios was the main reason why we build
> IronPython on our own (with changed assembly name and signing key) and
Hi, Jeff,
> Von: Jeff Hardy [mailto:jdha...@gmail.com]
> >> I figure if MS can do it with the .NET service packs, then we can
too.
> > :)
> >
> > .NET service packs run a lower risc of being downgraded silently by
an
> > installer unconditionally writing the old version into the GAC. :-(
>
> Onl
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Markus Schaber
wrote:
> Ok. But at least you should update the FileVersion then, or give some
> other visible indicator that allows at least manual diagnostics which
> version actually is installed.
Oh, of course! Only AssemblyVersion will remain the same.
>
>>
Hi, Jeff,
> Von: Jeff Hardy [mailto:jdha...@gmail.com]
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Markus Schaber software.com> wrote:
> > Fine, I'm looking forward to it. Is this release still compileable
> > using .NET 2.0?
>
> It should be, although I haven't tested that lately.
Fine.
> >> The mai
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Markus Schaber
wrote:
> Fine, I'm looking forward to it. Is this release still compileable using
> .NET 2.0?
It should be, although I haven't tested that lately.
>
>> The main reason for this release is to get the newly supported modules
>> (unicodedata, _ast, c
Hi, Jeff,
Von: Jeff Hardy
>
> I'm planning to release a Beta of IronPython 2.7.1 for this weekend
(June
> 18-19). I haven't decided on a timeline for the final release, but
expect
> it to be about 3 weeks later. Bug fixes will still be accepted after
the
> beta is released, but the sooner, the be
I'm planning to release a Beta of IronPython 2.7.1 for this weekend
(June 18-19). I haven't decided on a timeline for the final release,
but expect it to be about 3 weeks later. Bug fixes will still be
accepted after the beta is released, but the sooner, the better.
The main reason for this releas
18 matches
Mail list logo
