ttp://store.codesys.com
>> CODESYS forum: http://forum.codesys.com
>>
>> Managing Directors: Dipl.Inf. Dieter Hess, Dipl.Inf. Manfred Werner | Trade
>> register: Kempten HRB 6186 | Tax ID No.: DE 167014915
>>
>>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>>>
t;
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Jeff Hardy [mailto:jdha...@gmail.com]
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Februar 2014 10:01
>> An: Markus Schaber
>> Cc: ironpython-users@python.org
>> Betreff: Re: [Ironpython-users] Splitting up the IronPython repo
>
> To: Jeff Hardy
> Cc:
> Subject: [Ironpython-users] Splitting up the IronPython repo
>
> Hi, Jeff,
>
> I tried to open the IronPython solution file using Visual Studio 2010 Pro
> and 2012 Express for Desktop. Both failed to open the IronPython, IronPython
> and IronPyth
--Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Ironpython-users [mailto:ironpython-users-
> bounces+m.schaber=codesys....@python.org] Im Auftrag von Jeff Hardy
> Gesendet: Montag, 20. Januar 2014 10:10
> An: ironpython-users@python.org
> Betreff: [Ironpython-users] Splitting up the
he Nachricht-
> Von: Jeff Hardy [mailto:jdha...@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Februar 2014 10:01
> An: Markus Schaber
> Cc: ironpython-users@python.org
> Betreff: Re: [Ironpython-users] Splitting up the IronPython repo
>
> I did most of the work on my MacBook, just runni
egister: Kempten HRB 6186 | Tax ID No.: DE 167014915
>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Ironpython-users [mailto:ironpython-users-
>> bounces+m.schaber=codesys@python.org] Im Auftrag von Jeff Hardy
>> Gesendet: Montag, 20. Januar 2014 10:10
>> An: ironpython
icht-
> Von: Ironpython-users [mailto:ironpython-users-
> bounces+m.schaber=codesys....@python.org] Im Auftrag von Jeff Hardy
> Gesendet: Montag, 20. Januar 2014 10:10
> An: ironpython-users@python.org
> Betreff: [Ironpython-users] Splitting up the IronPython repo
>
> One
+1 on splitting.
I have been trying to quietly lobby for returning IronPython into the
Ubuntu distribution.
Splitting out Ruby would be a helpful step.
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Doug Blank wrote:
> +1 for these plans! I think this split will be good for the dlr, which
> hasn't (so far)
+1 for these plans! I think this split will be good for the dlr, which
hasn't (so far) been used as much as it could.
BTW, (and this is a small point) even though IronRuby is dead and was
never complete, it is still functional for some purposes. So, if it is
possible without major time commitments
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi, Jeff,
>
> Good work, I'm all in favour of it. Splitting DLR, IronPython and IronRuby
> into different projects is a good thing.
>
> Just some unordered thoughts:
>
> The python standard library could be fetched by the build script dire
6186 | Tax ID No.: DE 167014915
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Ironpython-users [mailto:ironpython-users-
> bounces+m.schaber=codesys@python.org] Im Auftrag von Jeff Hardy
> Gesendet: Montag, 20. Januar 2014 10:10
> An: ironpython-users@python.org
> Betreff: [Ironpy
One of the big issues with working on IronPython is the size of the
git repository (specifically https://github.com/IronLanguages/main) -
git does not like really big repos, especially on Windows. Part of the
problem is that the repository includes:
* The DLR
* IronPython
* IronRuby
* Two copies o
12 matches
Mail list logo