To reiterate Jeff's last point, if you'd really like to see something
continue to be supported, volunteering to help support it is the best
way to ensure that.
~Jimmy
On Jul 6, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Vernon Cole wrote:
>> I am really sorry to he
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Vernon Cole wrote:
> I am really sorry to hear about this happening. The combination of
> IronPython and Silver(Moon)light was going to be (I thought) my ticket to
> writing Python code rather than Javascript for browser based code. So: My
> question for the group
I am really sorry to hear about this happening. The combination of
IronPython and Silver(Moon)light was going to be (I thought) my ticket to
writing Python code rather than Javascript for browser based code. So: My
question for the group -- is Jython a viable alternative? Do we think that
SL5 wil
Hardy
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 11:28 AM
To: sepa...@sibmail.com
Cc: ironpython-users@python.org
Subject: Re: [Ironpython-users] WP7 & Silverlight Support in IronPython
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:05 PM, wrote:
> Silverlight is very necessary.
Would you be fine with SL5 only, as Jimmy sug
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 11:05 PM, wrote:
> Silverlight is very necessary.
Would you be fine with SL5 only, as Jimmy suggested? Also, how
necessary is it that IronPython 3 support it? I don't see SL having
much more takeup from now on, so I'm fine with supporting SL5 on 2.7
but dropping it from t
Didn't finish a sentence, updated below:
On Monday, July 2, 2012, Jimmy Schementi wrote:
> I'd only support the latest released version of Silverlight, as if someone
> really needs to support an older version of Silverlight (some internal app,
> for example), they can use older versions of IronPy
I'd only support the latest released version of Silverlight, as if someone
really needs to support an older version of Silverlight (some internal app,
for example). So I'd vote for only SL5.
There are tests for SL in Hosts/Silverlight
~js
On Saturday, June 30, 2012, Jeff Hardy wrote:
> Throwin
Silverlight is very necessary.
> Throwing some thoughts out there on future platform support:
>
> Given that Windows Phone 7 is basically dead in the water at this
> point, it doesn't seem worth it to support it. I'm going to remove the
> existing WP7 binaries, which don't work anyway, from 2.7.3.
Throwing some thoughts out there on future platform support:
Given that Windows Phone 7 is basically dead in the water at this
point, it doesn't seem worth it to support it. I'm going to remove the
existing WP7 binaries, which don't work anyway, from 2.7.3. If anyone
is interested in supporting it
