Hi ironpython,
Here's your Daily Digest of new issues for project "IronPython".
In today's digest:ISSUES
1. [New issue] IronPython.dll has wrong assembly version
2. [New issue] Try in the browser crash
--
ISSUES
1. [New issue] IronPython.dll has wro
To just add my relative outsider opinion (new user of IronPython, 5+
year user of CPython).
As long as a IronPython version does not adhere 100% to a CPython
version, it does not make sense to follow same version name
convention.
Better then to have a completely different "scale", e.g. 0.xyz. In
Hi,
I didn't realize that SymPy has a test suite built in. Trying to run it
gives:
=
>>>sympy.test()
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "", line 1, in
File "C:\Program Files
(x86)\WizoScript\PythonLib\site-packages\sympy\utilities
Compliance is determined by running the same test suite as CPython (the
reference implementation). The only tricky part is, should a test fail,
determining whether it is testing a language feature (must fix) or an
implementation detail (can skip).
For example, tests involving the Garbage Collec
OK, that sounds like a reasonable way to do it. Very nice that it is
automatically verifiable!
But it opens more questions from me, sorry. I find this interesting :)
So when an automatic test, that is determined to be a implementation
detail, fails - how does IronPython "skip" it? Is the actual t
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Olof Bjarnason
wrote:
> OK, that sounds like a reasonable way to do it. Very nice that it is
> automatically verifiable!
>
> But it opens more questions from me, sorry. I find this interesting :)
>
> So when an automatic test, that is determined to be a implementa
Hi,
Von: Jeff Hardy
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Olof Bjarnason
> wrote:
> > OK, that sounds like a reasonable way to do it. Very nice that it is
> > automatically verifiable!
> >
> > But it opens more questions from me, sorry. I find this interesting :)
> >
> > So when an automatic test,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Markus Schaber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Von: Jeff Hardy
>> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Olof Bjarnason
>> wrote:
>> > OK, that sounds like a reasonable way to do it. Very nice that it is
>> > automatically verifiable!
>> >
>> > But it opens more questions from me, s
Hi, Jeff,
Von: Jeff Hardy [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Markus Schaber
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Von: Jeff Hardy
> >> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Olof Bjarnason
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > OK, that sounds like a reasonable way to do it. Very nice that it
> >> >
it appears to work for me:
$ bin/Debug/ipy -X:Frames -c 'import sympy; sympy.test()'
= test process starts ==
executable:
C:\cygwin64\home\rejap\github\IronLanguages\bin\Debug\ipy.exe
(2.9.9-alpha-0) [IronPython]
architecture: 32-bit
ca
10 matches
Mail list logo
