Inline...
-Original Message-
From: Tomas Matousek
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 4:34 PM
To: Shri Borde; IronRuby External Code Reviewers
Cc: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: RE: Code Review: Issues with Thread#kill and raising exception from
ensure clause
Are any methods in RubyOps
Oops! Sorry for being a bit behind!
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Jimmy Schementi <
jimmy.scheme...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Foo.of(Bar).new works today … since it's about instantiating generic
> types … this discussion was only about generic methods.
>
>
>
> *From:* ironruby-core-boun...@rubyf
Outer ring looks good.
From: Tomas Matousek
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 4:08 PM
To: IronRuby External Code Reviewers; DLR Code Reviews
Cc: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Code Review: CompositeConversions3
tfpt review "/shelveset:CompositeConversions3;REDMOND\tomat"
DLR change (interpre
Are any methods in RubyOps Exceptions #region (including those added by this
shelveset) emitted to IL? If not they should rather be in RubyUtils class.
On the other hand, SourceUnitTree.CheckForAsyncRaiseViaThreadAbortshould should
be marked as [Emitted], be in RubyOps.cs and
SourceUnitTree.Gen
Interpreter change looks good.
From: Tomas Matousek
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 4:08 PM
To: IronRuby External Code Reviewers; DLR Code Reviews
Cc: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Code Review: CompositeConversions3
tfpt review "/shelveset:CompositeConversions3;REDMOND\tomat"
DLR change (
Yes, please.
Thanks,
Tomas
-Original Message-
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Alex 2k8
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 4:00 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] IronRuby hosting: self becomes ni
Hello,
Should I report this as IronRuby bug?
- Alex
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
Foo.of(Bar).new works today … since it's about instantiating generic types …
this discussion was only about generic methods.
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Riley
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 2:33 PM
To: ironruby-core@rub
Generic types already work:
List = List.of(Object).new
Tomas
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Riley
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 2:33 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Generic method synxtax
That's the right way :)
Thanks,
Tomas
-Original Message-
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Alex 2k8
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 1:25 PM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: Re: [Ironruby-core] Misleading error messa
tfpt review "/shelveset:kill;REDMOND\sborde"
Comment :
Added more tests for Thread#kill, and fixed bugs that were exposed. Throwing
an exception from the ensure clause exposes new code paths.
Ruby allows Thread#kill to be completely subverted (not just deferred as an
infinite loop i
How would this look for instantiating a generic object?
my_object = Foo.method(:new).of(Bar).call
That seems strange. Perhaps we need to possibilities: the above for generic
methods and the following for generic classes:
my_object = Foo.of(Bar).new
# where Foo would be defined as Foo in C#
my_c
Let's let Tomas implement content.method(:load).of(Texture2D).call(“mytexture”)
... and then we can play around with the different syntax in context. Then it's
pick-the-syntax-you-want =)
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Ri
I like Tomas's idea the best. Generics are not native to Ruby, so most
people using them will likely have a C#/VB background, which means Tomas's
syntax would be more familiar.
The "_of" syntax isn't bad, but forcing a ".do" or ".call" at the end isn't
ideal, even if it does have a bit of a Ruby f
Hi, Tomas
I submitted it as bug # 23508, thought did no assignments.
- Alex
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
The last 4 lines of the snippet could be slightly simplified:
var engine = IronRuby.Ruby.CreateEngine();
engine.Execute(code);
Tomas
-Original Message-
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Jimmy Schementi
Sent: Friday, Janua
Hi Jimmy,
thanks for the feedback (and the outlook snippet :-)!
I'll try that.
cheers
-- Thibaut
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
Thank you!
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
Embedding the files as resources would be your best bet, as we don't have
compilation to an assembly working today.
Basically (compiled with outlook ...):
var assembly = Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly();
var textStreamReader = new
StreamReader(assembly.GetManifestResourceStream("foo.rb"));
var c
Could you file a bug @ http://rubyforge.org/projects/ironruby/?
Thanks,
Tomas
-Original Message-
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Alex 2k8
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2009 7:55 AM
To: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Subject: [I
[3,4] is not an array of objects. It's a RubyArray.
You can create a CLR array like this:
v = System::Array.of(Object).new(3)
[1,2,3].each_with_index { |x,i| v[i] = x }
Tomas
-Original Message-
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On B
You'll need to build a CLR array rather than a Ruby array.
require 'mscorlib'
System::Array.create_instance(System::Object.to_clr_type, 2)
o = System::Array.create_instance(System::Object.to_clr_type, 2)
>>> o[0] = 3
>>> o[1] = 4
You can monkey-patch Array and add this as a helper:
class Array
Hello,
C#
public class Cls {
public void foo(object a) {
Console.WriteLine("foo #1");
}
public void foo(object[] a) {
Console.WriteLine("foo #2");
}
}
Ruby:
Cls.new.foo(7)
Cls.new.foo([3, 4])
Output:
foo #1
foo #1
Hello,
IronRuby throws misleading error message, when I call private method of
the C# class.
- - - -
C#
public class Cls {
private void private_method() {}
}
Ruby:
Cls.new.private_method
Output:
#
- - - -
- Alex.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
__
Thanks, http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/175284 fixed it.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
Hello,
I'm starting to integrate IronRuby files into a VisualStudio C# project,
mainly to write easy-to-maintain GUI builders.
As I don't want to have .rb files lying around this deployment, I had that
idea about embedding all the files inside an assembly, loading them at run
time through resource
I get svn.exe error...on Mac + Mono
Macintosh-2:Ruby Jirapong$ rake compile mono=1 --trace
(in /Users/Jirapong/ironruby/merlin/main/Languages/Ruby)
** Invoke compile (first_time)
** Invoke happy (first_time)
** Execute happy
Cannot find svn.exe on system path.
* Missing commands! You must ha
> This release includes support for local variables in the ir console.
> Enjoy J
That's a great thing!
thanks for your work
-- Thibaut
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
My changes went in this morning, so I have pushed SVN 183 and Git revision
69815c7.
Two things:
1) Git may be in a bad state due to CRLF issues and casing. Can I get a
confirmation that it compiles and runs?
2) This release includes support for local variables in the ir console.
Enj
FYI, Going in via direct commit
tfpt review "/shelveset:rakefix2;REDMOND\jdeville"
Comment :
More changes for git
rakefix2.diff
Description: rakefix2.diff
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman
30 matches
Mail list logo
