Ah, I see. Still, something strikes me as odd about the name, but I don't feel
strongly about it.
-Original Message-
From: Tomas Matousek
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 3:57 PM
To: Curt Hagenlocher; IronRuby External Code Reviewers; Rowan Code Reviewers
Cc: ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
Sub
You mean IsNestedProteced()? "Nested" feels superfluous since only nested types
could be protected.
Tomas
-Original Message-
From: Curt Hagenlocher
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 2:05 PM
To: Tomas Matousek; IronRuby External Code Reviewers; Rowan Code Reviewers
Cc: ironruby-core@rubyfor
Changes look good overall. I'm not sure that Type.IsProtected() is an intuitive
name; maybe Type.IsNested() would be clearer?
-Original Message-
From: Tomas Matousek
Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 12:51 PM
To: IronRuby External Code Reviewers; Rowan Code Reviewers
Cc: ironruby-core@rubyfo
tfpt review "/shelveset:ProGenFix;REDMOND\tomat"
DLR, Python, Ruby.
Fixes Ruby calls to protected generic methods.
Adds CompilerHelpers.IsProtected() as an alias for IsFamily ||
IsFamilyOrAssembly.
Tomas
ProGenFix.diff
Description: ProGenFix.diff
The script itself might check some (global) variable time to time and if it is
"on" terminate itself. For example, use Kernel#select with a timeout instead of
sleep.
Tomas
-Original Message-
From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
[mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Beha
It wouldn't surprise me if there is a bug. If you look at the Mspec tags,
you'll see that a lot of the net/http library is critical (meaning it hangs or
crashes the interpreter). Feel free to file a bug, or take a look to start
cleaning it up (if the SOAP stuff isn't already keeping you busy ;))
So the signatures I'm talking about look like this:
protected internal void UpdateModel(TModel model) where
TModel : class {
UpdateModel(model, null, null, null, ValueProvider);
}
protected internal void UpdateModel(TModel model, string
prefix) where TModel : cl
It would be good to be more specific about the example.
Consider class Foo {
public void Bar(int, object);
public void Bar(int, string);
}
If I call "Foo.new.Bar 1, nil", then this is an ambiguous call and you should
be forced to specify which overload you want.
In statically-typed lang
In C# you can pass null to a string parameter and it won't complain I
expected this to work from ironruby too because it did before. So I want to
find out if that is going to be a permanent change or if it is a bug :)
so i'm not talking about an empty instance of String being nil but it's
about i
Just curious, but why should nil count as a string object? In C Ruby, nil is
an object, and an empty string object is not nil:
irb(main):001:0> n = nil
=> nil
irb(main):002:0> s = String.new
=> ""
irb(main):003:0> n.nil?
=> true
irb(main):004:0> s.nil?
=> false
irb(main):005:0> s == n
=> false
irb
Hi
Since this weeks updates to ironruby ironrubymvc is completely broken.
The way overloads are selected now is different.
for example asp.net mvc has a bunch of methods defined on Controller that
are protected internal ie. protected internal void View(string, string)
it also has an overload View
Hi,
I'm trying to execute the next code:
require 'net/http'
require 'uri'
puts "starting..."
url = URI.parse('http://localhost/test3/demo.aspx')
puts "retrieving..."
res = Net::HTTP.post_form(url,
{"FullName" => "Shay Friedman"})
puts "writing"
File.open("test.txt","w"
12 matches
Mail list logo
