Re: [Ironruby-core] Visual Ruby / Ruby in Steel — what's up?

Thanks guys. I'm really glad you're enjoying the book! Regarding a place with all the release differences - currently there isn't such a place. I will talk to my editor and maybe we will generate one soon. However, I don't think that the Silverlight chapter has a lot of differences. Regarding the

Re: [Ironruby-core] igems update --system, [BUG] invalid exec_format "ir", no %s

If you put the file I referenced in the correct location, you can then just: ir -S gem update --system After that, the gem and gem.bat files in %IronRubyRoot%\bin get re-written with the correct path to the correct interpreter (as will any scripts installed by ruby gems AFTER this), so from then

Re: [Ironruby-core] bug?

> The offending line is auto generated by rubygems for me (1.3.7). > I am unsure how the other poster found success for his, though. That is odd. IronRuby ships with RubyGems 1.3.5, so try using that first. You can verify your version of RubyGems by running: D:\> ir -e "require 'rubygems'; puts

Re: [Ironruby-core] bug?

Will Green wrote: > Ah, I see that there is no C code in the ext directory of the > faster_rubygems code: http://github.com/rdp/faster_rubygems > > It looks like a problem with spaces in the path to your IronRuby > install. > "C:\Program FIles" is not being properly escaped, and the script chokes

Re: [Ironruby-core] igems update --system, [BUG] inva lid exec_format "ir", no %s

Will Green wrote: > http://hotgazpacho.org/2010/05/ironruby-gem-update-system/ > > -- > Will Green > http://hotgazpacho.org/ Hi Will, I'd tried your version as well, same result. I'll doublecheck now though ... --ab -- Posted via ht

Re: [Ironruby-core] igems update --system, [BUG] inva lid exec_format "ir", no %s

Will Green wrote: > I don't use the i-whatever batch files. Untill this fix, I just did > > ir -S whatever > > -- > Will Green > http://hotgazpacho.org/ Forgive me for not being super knowledgeable about syntax, but what do I need to pass it as a param for the rubygems package? I've downloaded

Re: [Ironruby-core] igems update --system, [BUG] invalid exec_format "ir", no %s

I don't use the i-whatever batch files. Untill this fix, I just did ir -S whatever -- Will Green http://hotgazpacho.org/ On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Andrew Badera wrote: > Andrew Badera wrote: > > Will Green wrote: > >> http://hotgazpacho.org/2010/05/ironruby-gem-update-system/ > >>

Re: [Ironruby-core] igems update --system, [BUG] inva lid exec_format "ir", no %s

Andrew Badera wrote: > Will Green wrote: >> http://hotgazpacho.org/2010/05/ironruby-gem-update-system/ >> >> -- >> Will Green >> http://hotgazpacho.org/ > > > Hi Will, > > I'd tried your version as well, same result. I'll doublecheck n

Re: [Ironruby-core] igems update --system, [BUG] invalid exec_format "ir", no %s

http://hotgazpacho.org/2010/05/ironruby-gem-update-system/ -- Will Green http://hotgazpacho.org/ On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Andrew Badera wrote: > Hi all, Ruby n00b here. Longtime Windows/.NET guy primarily. > > Trying to get Ir

Re: [Ironruby-core] bug?

Actually, faster_rubygems installed fine on IronRuby 1.0 for me, and I have it installed in a location with spaces, so what is the actual problem? C:\windows\system32>ir -S gem install faster_rubygems Building native extensions. This could take a while... faster_rubygems installed! see the rea

[Ironruby-core] igems update --system, [BUG] invalid exec_format "ir", no %s

Hi all, Ruby n00b here. Longtime Windows/.NET guy primarily. Trying to get IronRuby and RoR up and running on Windows 7 x64 with IIS7.5, with .NET 4.0 installed along with the IronRuby 1.0v4 release. Running into the RubyGems igem update --system issue with the response of: [BUG] invalid exec_fo

Re: [Ironruby-core] bug?

Ah, I see that there is no C code in the ext directory of the faster_rubygems code: http://github.com/rdp/faster_rubygems It looks like a problem with spaces in the path to your IronRuby install. "C:\Program FIles" is not being properly escaped, and the script chokes.

Re: [Ironruby-core] bug?

Will Green wrote: > That depends on how the platform is determined by mkrf. Can you verify > what > mkrf is using to determine the platform? Here's a printout of IronRuby's > RbConfig: mkrf is used by "all platforms" (in this case, it's pure ruby and platform independent, so doesn't actually *us

Re: [Ironruby-core] Visual Ruby / Ruby in Steel - what's up?

I agree totally. It is a shame the guys from SapphireSteel don't continue their integration work in Visual Studio for IronRuby. They did a terrific job for integrating Ruby in Visual Studio. Microsoft should be very grateful to them, buying the code they already wrote for the integration of IronRub

Re: [Ironruby-core] bug?

That depends on how the platform is determined by mkrf. Can you verify what mkrf is using to determine the platform? Here's a printout of IronRuby's RbConfig: >>> pp RbConfig::CONFIG {"MAJOR"=>"1", "MINOR"=>"8", "TEENY"=>"6", "PATCHLEVEL"=>"0", "EXEEXT"=>".exe", "ruby_install_name"=>"ir", "R

Re: [Ironruby-core] Visual Ruby / Ruby in Steel — what's up?

I just received a reply from Huw Collingbourne from ShappireSteel (the makes of Ruby in Steel) about the support for VS 2010: -- Ruby In Steel 1.5 supports VS2008 and 2005 only. We will have more to say about VS2010 later this summer and will post information on our Blog. be

Re: [Ironruby-core] Visual Ruby / Ruby in Steel — what's up?

Miguel Madero wrote: > One question, what sort of Xaml/IR integration are you looking at? First, what Shay Friedman says in talking about IDE's in "IronRuby Unleashed" on page 37: "the ability to run IronRuby directly" from its interface. And secondly, what my colleague(s) show me with VS and C

Re: [Ironruby-core] Visual Ruby / Ruby in Steel — what's up?

I would prefer a visual studio 2010 compatible solution. The rationale about that is the integration with SQL Server and the .net windows world. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. ___ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://

Re: [Ironruby-core] bug?

Jimmy Schementi wrote: > IronRuby doesn't support faster_rubygems as it contains a c-based > extension compiled against MRI. faster_rubygems doesn't contain a c-based extension, it contains a mkrf_conf.rb file, which ends up being pure ruby, and works fine with jruby (which also doesn't support

Re: [Ironruby-core] Visual Ruby / Ruby in Steel — what's up?

+1 for RubyMine. I am a total JetBrains fanboy. One nice benefit of RubyMine for me is that your license works for both windows and OSX so one nice ide for ruby on multiple platforms. On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Shay Friedman wrote: > I'm using RubyMine and it works perfectly and you can als

Re: [Ironruby-core] Visual Ruby / Ruby in Steel — what's up?

I'm using RubyMine and it works perfectly and you can also configure it to use the IronRuby interpreter. I have instructions how to do that in my book and I've found out that you can get it for free on Amazon (should I even say that? eh whatever) - go to the book's page

Re: [Ironruby-core] Visual Ruby / Ruby in Steel — what's up?

Hi Rober, A great option might be RubyMine. There was some discussion in their forum last year about making it work for IR. Not sure how far this got, but AFAIR they were going to look into it. Here's an old post from Ivanabout how to

Re: [Ironruby-core] bug?

IronRuby doesn't support faster_rubygems as it contains a c-based extension compiled against MRI. > -Original Message- > From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-core- > boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Roger Pack > Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 7:05 PM > To: ironruby