Re: [Ironruby-core] Preparing 1.1.2 release

Re binaries - 3 flavors are currently built: 1) Desktop CLR 4.0 (.NET FW 4.0, Mono 2.10) 2) Core CLR 4.0 (Silverlight 4.0, Moonlight) 3) Core CLR 3.0 (Windows Phone 7) So yes, the binaries should be equivalent. They won't be byte-for-byte equal, but should functionally be the s

Re: [Ironruby-core] Preparing 1.1.2 release

> > Great! I spent some time to make xbuild happy J, I’m glad it works on > non-Windows boxes as well. > Thanks for that really :) I've got a question wrt the build script we could set up: are the resulting binaries different if I compile from Mac OS X, as compared with Ubuntu ? If they are iden

Re: [Ironruby-core] Preparing 1.1.2 release

Great! I spent some time to make xbuild happy :), I'm glad it works on non-Windows boxes as well. I filed a couple of Mono bugs (crashes) yesterday: http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669808 (GetCustomAttributes crash) http://bugzilla

Re: [Ironruby-core] Preparing 1.1.2 release

> > I'm cloning it right now (then I'll look where is Ruby.sln, because I have > no idea yet :-)). I'll report back here after doing a few basic tests. > I can report the compile went without any issue as long as I'm on Mono 2.10 RC2. I was able to start "mono ir.exe" and do a couple of things. r

Re: [Ironruby-core] Preparing 1.1.2 release

> > I’ll publish the binaries in the evening today. That said, there wasn’t > really any testing on non-Windows platform at all that I know of. So it > might be best to build a debug build from sources instead of using release > build. Error stack traces will be better. > > Mono 2.10 RC2 is able to

Re: [Ironruby-core] Preparing 1.1.2 release

I'll publish the binaries in the evening today. That said, there wasn't really any testing on non-Windows platform at all that I know of. So it might be best to build a debug build from sources instead of using release build. Error stack traces will be better. Mono 2.10 RC2 is able to build Ruby

Re: [Ironruby-core] Preparing 1.1.2 release

Hi Tomas, I'm willing to try 1.1.2 a bit on Mac OS X if you'd like. How can I download it ? (the link you provided is a .msi only if I'm right ?) As well, I recall someone mentioning issues to ensure RVM would be able to automatically download it (maybe EULA agreement on codeplex that could not

Re: [Ironruby-core] Preparing 1.1.2 release

IronRuby 1.1.2 runs on Mono, though there are some bugs in Mono that might cause issues in certain scenarios. The best Mono version to try it on would be 2.10. The .msi requires .NET 4.0, a separate zip package with raw dlls will be available later today (you can always build from sources as wel

Re: [Ironruby-core] Preparing 1.1.2 release

Will this run on Mono or is .net 4.0 required? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. ___ Ironruby-core mailing list Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core

Re: [Ironruby-core] Preparing 1.1.2 release

Oops :( Let's try again: http://cid-b3ba7307194acfee.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/IronRuby/IronRuby.msi I have the binaries ready, will publish them in the evening unless there is some major issue. Tomas -Original Message- From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:ironruby-co

Re: [Ironruby-core] How can you return the Rubified version of a CLR object back to the CLR?

But there is an Object that is a Ruby string which does understand #reverse. Is there a way to get that object from Ruby back to the DLR? Take a look at: http://pastie.org/1537151 Using SimpleDelegator I can send back a delegate to Ruby's string and access the reverse method. Unfortunately, sin

Re: [Ironruby-core] Preparing 1.1.2 release

Unfortunately none of the links are accessible... Regards Eduardo Tomas Matousek wrote in post #979978: > Preliminary binaries are here packaged as an .msi (hopefully, it's > accessible): > > http://alturl.com/3xnzm > > Let me know if there were any problems with the installation. Especially > tes