When IR achieves a compatibility that will run Rails 3, I'm planning on getting
it running thru an ASP.NET site which will enable deployment to the Azure
platform. I believe that will be a very compelling solution for many people,
especially with a mapper adapter to Table Storage.
Mark
Sent fr
Oh, and RavenDB, which I have successfully deployed as an Azure worker role.
Mark
Sent from my iPhone
On 30 Jul 2010, at 23:27, Orion Edwards wrote:
>
> On 29/07/2010, at 4:40 PM, Nathan Stults wrote:
>
>> Yeah, but who wants to *deploy* Ruby code on Windows?
>
> Personally, I wouldn't run
You can use json_pure, which has no native code but provides all the same
classes and methods.
Mark
Sent from my iPhone
On 24 Jul 2010, at 13:34, Aaron Clauson wrote:
> When attempting:
>
> igem install json
>
> I get an error stating "ERROR: Failed to build gem native extension."
>
> I ha
Hi Jimmy,
I've just released the first version of IronMock ( http://bit.ly/ironmock )
which uses 9 lines of embedded IronRuby to apply interfaces to objects at
runtime. It can be used for duck-typing any object, but there's also a
DynamicObject-based mocking class.
If you want a quote:
"I achiev
has had the most success in greasing the open-source wheels at
> Microsoft, and it’s a license both teams can agree on.
>
>
>
> *From:* ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:
> ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] *On Behalf Of *Mark Rendle
> *Sent:* Friday, June 04, 2
I strongly recommend uninstalling and re-installing IronRuby to C:\ironruby.
It will make your life much easier.
Mark
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 12:28 AM, Mohammad Azam wrote:
> I downloaded and installed IronRuby V 1 awesome work guys!!
>
> I went to command line and typed:
>
> igem install rspec
Any specific reasons for choosing Apache, as opposed to BSD (or even MIT)?
On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:33 AM, Jimmy Schementi <
jimmy.scheme...@microsoft.com> wrote:
> As you probably know, IronRuby is currently licensed under the Microsoft
> Public License (http://opensource.org/licenses/ms-pl.html
I'm halfway through a library which serializes dynamic types to JSON. I
guess that should work in this case; I'll post when it's done.
Cheers,
Mark
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:01 PM, Ben Hall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to use a third party library which has a dependency on
> NewtonSoft.json. I c
In terms of MRI compatibility, I'd suggest that 1.9.2 would be a good
target. 1.9.1 has various issues and has been largely ignored in favour of
1.8.7, but I'm seeing a lot of people recommending 1.9.2 even in its current
pre state.
Beyond compatibility, I think VS integration would be sweet, and
; [72 (Byte), 101 (Byte), 108 (Byte), 108 (Byte), 111 (Byte)]
> >>> Encoding.UTF8.get_string(bytes)
> => 'Hello'
>
> Shay.
>
> Shay Friedman | Author of IronRuby Unleashed
> Blog: http://IronShay.com
I'm trying to use the waz-storage gem for talking to Windows Azure storage
services, but it uses kconv and there's a problem with the toutf8 mix-in
method, which is trying to call NKF.nkf, which is not defined.
Repro:
irb(main):001:0> require 'kconv'
=> true
irb(main):002:0> "foo".toutf8
NoMethod
MRI 1.9.1 is my Linux Ruby of choice, so I'm definitely in favour of 1.9
being the focus for IronRuby, and as soon as I can clone a 1.x branch I'll
be all over it, with Rails 3 testing as a focus. (Eventual aim: to prove
IronRuby & Rails 3 as a cool Windows Azure solution).
Mark
On Mon, Feb 15,
Mainly Rails 3.0 compatibility. I'd far rather 1.9.x than 1.8.7, but not at
the expense of Rails compatibility taking longer.
Mark
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Jim Deville wrote:
> Along these lines:
>
>
>
> Are you interested in the 1.8.7 features, or just things like Rails compat
> (which
Hi Bassel,
Ruby provides its own support for asynchronous operations in its Thread
class:
Thread.new do
puts "howdy!"
end
If you specifically need to run a .NET delegate asynchronously, you can call
its invoke method within this structure:
Thread.new do
my_action.invoke
end
More info on Ru
It seems a shame that the 1.0 release of IronRuby isn't going to be able to
run Rails 3, since they seem to be landing at around the same time. I guess
the differences between MRI 1.8.6 and 1.8.7 are pretty major, though, so not
much can be done about it at this stage?
Any idea how long after the
uby-core] Rails 3?
>
>
>
> I don't think anybody tried that already. I'd be keen to get your results
> ---
> Met vriendelijke groeten - Best regards - Salutations
> Ivan Porto Carrero
> Blog: http://flanders.co.nz
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/casualjim
> Author of
I'm planning to try the Rails 3 beta with IronRuby later today. Is there any
reason it just flat-out won't work yet? I noted that R3 requires MRI 1.8.7
because of a hash-equality bug in 1.8.6, whereby two different hashes
containing the same values are not considered equal, preventing hashes from
b
17 matches
Mail list logo
