tHub Pages:
> http://ironlanguages.github.io/ironruby.net/
>
> RubyCentral is in the process of changing ironruby.net to point to it.
> I’ll reply to this thread when that’s done.
>
> ~js
>
> ___
>
/ironruby-core
>>
>
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
--//---
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
gt; The views expressed in this e-mail may not be those of Gallagher Group Ltd
> or subsidiary companies thereof.
>
> --
>
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael L
"~>" => lambda { |v, r| v = v.release; v >= r && v < r.bump }
}
No promises on the issue not creeping up down the road though...
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Michael Letterle
wrote:
> This appears to be a result of the following mono bug:
> https://bugzill
; and I've also built IronRuby v1.1.2 and v1.1.3 from source. I get the same
> error in all three versions. Has anyone else experience this and knows what
> the issue might be?
>
> //M
>
> --
> phone: +46 (0)709 78 40 03
> e-mail: m...@upplopp.se
> twitter: http://twi
ou for ahead. :)
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
--
Michael Letterle
--//--
Yes, i concur. But really anything is better then the current Wik.is page.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Mike Moore wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2011, at 5:55 PM, Michael Letterle
> wrote:
>
>> Anyway to at least have the domain redirect to the github wiki or
>> something? Or
ling list
>> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>
>
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
--//---
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
ft.Dynamic/1.1.0.10__7f709c5b713576e1
>> > >
>> > > ./usr/lib64/mono/gac/Microsoft.Dynamic/1.1.0.10__7f709c5b713576e1/
>> > > Micro so ft.Dynamic.dll ./usr/lib64/mono/gac/Microsoft.Scripting
>> > > ./usr/lib64/mo
I'm seeing much funkiness on mono.. for instance neither system shell
strings nor regex's appear to be working...
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Michael Letterle
wrote:
> The following two bugs have been filed against mono, there are current
> work arounds implemented on my
; >
>>> > Cory
>>> > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>>>
>>> --
>>> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>>> ___
>>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>>> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>
>
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
/show_bug.cgi?id=649448
REGRESSION: labels inside of delegates defined as a method argument
cannot be resolved
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Michael Letterle
wrote:
> By "target" I meant "do primary development against" ^_^
>
> BTW my branch is updated, I reset to the curre
Ironruby-core] Compiling on Mono?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Michael Letterle
> wrote:
>
> Unless we target Mono >.>
>
>
>
> +1
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge
ers out there that would love to be able
>>> to run Ruby code in .NET.
>>>
>>> Hope to hear from you soon!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gøran Hansen
>>> Aspiring Software Craftsman
>>> Microsoft Regional Director
>>>
>>> http://twitter.com/goeran
>>> http://goeran.no
>>> m...@goeran.no
>>> +47 452 39 113
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>>> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Gøran Hansen
>> Aspiring Software Craftsman
>> Microsoft Regional Director & MVP
>>
>> http://twitter.com/goeran
>> http://goeran.no
>> m...@goeran.no
>> +47 452 39 113
>
>
>
> --
> Gøran Hansen
> Aspiring Software Craftsman
> Microsoft Regional Director & MVP
>
> http://twitter.com/goeran
> http://goeran.no
> m...@goeran.no
> +47 452 39 113
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
ckers, and add a comment to the code with explanation and a link to the
> filed IronRuby bug. When the bug is fixed in Mono we go and remove the
> workaround to keep the code base clean.
>
> Tomas
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
>
rs will
> know, why are there 2 build systems now? Why is there a *.build.csproj for
> every *.csproj? Isn't that redudant like the suggested rakefiles?
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
up into submoldules, you could have just IronPython's CodePlex being
> replicated to an IronPython git repo.
>>
This I agree with. The current repo structure is counter-intuitive IMHO.
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
__
`StreamContentProvider' could not be found. Are you
>> > missing a using directive or an assembly reference?
>> > ___
>> > Ironruby-core mailing list
>> > Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
46: The type or
> namespace name `StreamContentProvider' could not be found. Are you missing a
> using directive or an assembly reference?
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rub
and integration server.
> Feel free to disagree.
>>>
>>> Why not make a dedicated repo for IronRuby free of the ancillary projects
>>> and geared to someone like me? And likewise make the IronPython repo
>>> friendly to our Pythonic friends?
>>
from
/home/mletterle/src/ironruby/Languages/Ruby/bin/Debug/../../../../External.LCA_RESTRICTED/Languages/Ruby/ruby19/lib/ruby/1.9.1/rubygems/custom_require.rb:29:in
`require'
Again, same errors occur if I'm using the prebuilt assemblies or self-built.
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
is just at
> build time?
>
> We should work with JB to get any issues fixed.
>
> Tomas
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
> [mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Michael Letterle
> Sent: Saturday, October
Working on it actually... ;) Maybe, possibly, with a patch as well...
(perhaps).
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Jb Evain wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Michael Letterle
> wrote:
>> Mono didn't like how some stuff was done in Enumerable.cs, but
nning the tests now.
Changes are here: http://github.com/mletterle/ironruby/tree/linux
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 7:02 AM, Michael Letterle
wrote:
> Well, it's just the DEBUG constant and a MONO constant.
>
> I'm building with mono trunk, I added the MONO to the ifdef to use the
> M
k?
>
> What version of Mono do you use? I think 2.8 should be the target for
> IronRUby.
>
> Tomas
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org
> [mailto:ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] On Behalf Of Michael Letterle
> Sent: Friday, October
asons this should not be done?
>> What else do you guys think needs to change now that IronRuby is free from
>> Microsoft's processes?
>> ___
>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>> Ironruby-core@rubyforge
are free TFS tools available in any case.
http://codeplex.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=Source%20Control&version=1
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
e disappeared.. anyone know what happened?
I'm taking a look now on building under mono on linux, it's something
me and Ivan were working on earlier in the year and this seems like a
good time to revisit.
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
;>>> >> participants because of the new awareness.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> That said, I don't think that what we should do right now is fork
>>>>> >> it,
>>>>> >> since IronRuby relies heavily on the DLR which wouldn't be
>>>>> >> controlled.
>>>>> >> This is not to say that we take it off the table. Rather we need to
>>>>> >> ask
>>>>> >> ourselves what holes have now opened up that we need to fill:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> 1) Jimmy provided leadership and vision for the project. We've now
>>>>> >> lost
>>>>> >> that, and either Tomas will pick this up internally, or we will need
>>>>> >> an
>>>>> >> external person to run with the vision. Regardless, the person will
>>>>> >> have
>>>>> >> to interface with and understand the vision from the Microsoft side.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> 2) Tomas already mentioned needs like a CI and gatekeeper. I bet
>>>>> >> there
>>>>> >> are lots of other needs, and if this is truly a community-owned
>>>>> >> movement, we need to engage with Tomas and the remaining team to
>>>>> >> understand what else we're missing.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> 3) IronRuby has likely taken a huge blow of credibility from the
>>>>> >> enterprise adoption side, because if it isn't supported by Microsoft
>>>>> >> PSS, they will be unlikely to use it internally or in their
>>>>> >> products.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> All three of these are vital points that we need to think about as a
>>>>> >> community. Someone is going to have to step up to take charge of
>>>>> >> this -
>>>>> >> and it's not going to come from the Mono side. Tomas may be willing
>>>>> >> to
>>>>> >> take charge as much as possible - no one has asked him, and that's a
>>>>> >> shame.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> IronRuby has not had a heart attack which requires CPR. That means
>>>>> >> we
>>>>> >> need to take a measured, levelheaded response as a community and
>>>>> >> work to
>>>>> >> understand how we can help and how we can respond in a way that
>>>>> >> makes
>>>>> >> sense. We already know from Jimmy's tweets that he's planning an
>>>>> >> email
>>>>> >> for the group - how can we take advantage of the knowledge Jim and
>>>>> >> Jimmy
>>>>> >> have, and support the work Tomas is doing?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Finally, we may have a burst of energy right now, but no form of
>>>>> >> sprinting is going to help solve this. This is not a "we have to
>>>>> >> take
>>>>> >> action now before we lose the opportunity!" moment. The code is
>>>>> >> there.
>>>>> >> Many of the contributors are there, and know what is going on
>>>>> >> internally. Let's collaborate and find a way to make this project a
>>>>> >> real
>>>>> >> success.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Cory
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
>>>>> > ___
>>>>> > Ironruby-core mailing list
>>>>> > Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>>>>> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>>>> >
>>>>> ___
>>>>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>>>>> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>>>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>>>>> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>>>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>>>>> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>>>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>>>> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ironruby-core mailing list
>>> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
byforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
e of this -
>> >> and it's not going to come from the Mono side. Tomas may be willing to
>> >> take charge as much as possible - no one has asked him, and that's a
>> >> shame.
>> >>
>> >>
ntrols it opens up commit access beyond the
> MSFT core team, perhaps to those that have already had accepted contribution.
> (this may already be in place, I don't
> know)
>
> Bottom line is that MSFT has decided they no longer desire to invest in the
> project. If we
us hanging, why on earth would I want to do work on their behalf after
> they've just done that?"
>
>
>
> At any rate, I've not committed any code to IronRuby (I've come close
> several times, but never just had the time) so my opinion is largely
> irrelevant, I just hope that other potential committ
o:
> ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Letterle
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 19, 2010 12:32 PM
> *To:* ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> *Subject:* [Ironruby-core] IronRuby.net Wiki Spam
>
>
>
> There's a ton of spam comments on the wiki...
There's a ton of spam comments on the wiki... is there anyway to clean these
up?
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
C extension, though it seems like you can run racc without it.
>
> ~Jimmy
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http:
rto Carrero
> Blog: http://flanders.co.nz
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/casualjim
> Author of IronRuby in Action (http://manning.com/carrero)
>
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyf
npython.com
>> http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
>
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
indows/notepad.exe") # Prints false only for me
>
>
>
> With the 1.9 binaries, File.executable? returns true only if the file
> extensions is something like .exe. Again, it always returns true for the
> people I have asked.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shri
>
>
&
n array of System::String ? Or a
> conversion ?
>
> cheers,
>
> -- Thibaut
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
&g
to the module and the methods it declares?
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
soft.com> wrote:
> Thanks! Linked to from here: http://ironruby.net/About
>
>
>
> ~js
>
>
>
> *From:* ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org [mailto:
> ironruby-core-boun...@rubyforge.org] *On Behalf Of *Michael Letterle
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 17, 2009 7:12 PM
&g
http://ironruby.colliertech.org/integrity/
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Michael Letterle <
michael.lette...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Working on that ;)
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Jimmy Schementi <
> jimmy.scheme...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>>
ould update again, but only when I push to my linux branch
> (for now): http://twitter.com/ironrubyci
>
> --
> Michael Letterle
> IronRuby MVP
> http://blog.prokrams.com
>
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
&g
Is up and running again, under integrity now: http://www.integrityapp.com
The twitter should update again, but only when I push to my linux branch
(for now): http://twitter.com/ironrubyci
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
oding() {
+ private BinaryEncoding():base(0) {
+
}
public override int GetByteCount(char[]/*!*/ chars, int index, int
count) {
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Michael Letterle <
michael.lette...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have this bug fixed in my linux/mono branch. File a bug (
_______
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
:Show).arity
> => 0
> >>>
>
> This is the latest daily DLR build on codeplex from 2009 Feb 1 at
> 9:36 PM. I read, that with older versions winforms interop has already been
> working.
>
>
> -- henon
>
>
>
> ________
On Behalf Of *Jimmy Schementi
> *Sent:* Friday, February 06, 2009 6:23 PM
>
> *To:* ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] automating VS
>
>
>
> Na, that was definitely VS 2008. We just had our VS ninja Oleg write a VS
> extension that hosts the DLR
___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
D'oh, it's not RubyConf it's PDC:
http://mschnlnine.vo.llnwd.net/d1/pdc08/WMV/TL44.wmv check around the
35minute mark.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Michael Letterle wrote:
> Ivan,
>
> The RubyConf2008 talk? It's on confreaks:
> http://rubyconf2008.confreaks.
FWIW, the major issue seems to be
Merlin/Main/Runtime/Microsoft.Scripting/Microsoft.Scripting.Build.csproj not
including Runtime\BindingRestrictionsHelpers.cs
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Michael Letterle wrote:
> Build is currently broken and it appears that MERLIN_ROOT is still
> re
list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
IronRuby MVP
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
Indeed, but it doesn't regression test building on mono (or under linux).
Just wanted to confirm this wasn't happening since that's what I've been
working on and don't want to duplicate efforts.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Michael Foord wrote:
> Michael Letterle
builds out
> of the git repository, but until then this may ease the pain in getting
> builds.
>
>
>
> ~js
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforg
I forgot to send the emails. Sorry
> about that. I've just pushed a new Git Revision.
>
>
>
> Enjoy
>
>
>
> JD
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/ma
ures. The name of the file ends
> in a ~ and apparently ironruby doesn't like that.
>
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Prokrammer]
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Prokrammer]
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
mation about the MVP program:
> https://mvp.support.microsoft.com
>
> ~Jimmy
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymat
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Prokrammer]
http://blog.prokrams.com
__
Tim
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Prokrammer]
http://blog.prokrams.com
gt; Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Prokrammer]
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
ain:Object (NoMethodError)
>
>
> Any idea, why this error thrown by IronRuby?
>
> - Alex
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
> __
/www.ruby-forum.com/.
> _______
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Prokrammer]
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
ailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Prokrammer]
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
any different than writing "t.value.should == t"? Is either of them
> the recommended way? Seems odd to support two ways of writing the exact same
> thing.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shri
>
>
>
> _______
> Iron
in
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Prokrammer]
http://blog.prokra
ot;
> Comment :
> Fixes the imports to reference the files in a platform agnostic way.
>
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
--
Michael Le
list
>> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>>
>
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Prokrammer]
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
7;
>> /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.3/lib/rake.rb:1967:in `run'
>> /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.3/bin/rake:31
>> /usr/bin/rake:19:in `load'
>> /usr/bin/rake:19
>>
>> Can someone help me out please?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Sidu.
>> h
`standard_exception_handling'
>> /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.3/lib/rake.rb:1967:in `run'
>> /Library/Ruby/Gems/1.8/gems/rake-0.8.3/bin/rake:31
>> /usr/bin/rake:19:in `load'
>> /usr/bin/rake:19
>>
>> Can someone help me out please?
>
y to keep up the daily releases.
>
>
>
> Enjoy!
>
>
>
> JD
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Mi
_
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Prokrammer]
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironru
ammer/ironruby/tree/linux
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Prokrammer]
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
eflection.TargetInvocationException' occurred in mscorlib.dll
> > A first chance exception of type
> > 'System.Reflection.TargetInvocationException' occurred in mscorlib.dll
> > A first chance exception of type
> > 'Microsoft.Scripting.InvalidImplementat
I could find from
> the subversion repository (trunk\src\microsoft.scripting.core\debugkey.snk)
> over my manually generated key, but this didn't yield the correct public key
> token either (it gives 51c7b9aefdaeb546).
>
> So, now I'm totally stuck. Any h
Wrox.
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Prokrammer]
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
ther than hide the bad casings.
> Problems with inconsistent casing might be discovered earlier if the right
> casing is enforced everywhere.
>
>
>
> Tomas
>
>
>
> *From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Michael Letterle
> *Sen
/
>
> runtime/
>
>
>
> Pete
>
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
>
>
> --
> Michael Letterle
> [P
Utilities/
>
> languages/
>
> runtime/
>
>
>
> Pete
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/l
rosoft.com/wcf/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=298408
>
> I also noticed that "puts" does not output the value of Int64. However, it
> does if I use Console.WriteLine in my ruby program.
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://
N pushes the past few days. I've been trying
> to finish things up and get the infrastructure for the Git repo into place.
> I'll get a fresh revision out tomorrow morning, and I expect to start daily
> Git pushes next week.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> JD
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
> JD
>
> http://blog.jredville.com
>
>
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
>
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Prokrammer]
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
e back
> into our internal codebase, and shipping on Codeplex, but there are no
> problems with keeping things on GitHub for now.
>
> Let me know if there are any question. I know I've been a bit silent on the
> Silverlight front, but take this as me making it up to you. ;)
>
&
g on Codeplex, but there are no
> problems with keeping things on GitHub for now.
>
> Let me know if there are any question. I know I've been a bit silent on the
> Silverlight front, but take this as me making it up to you. ;)
>
> ~Jimmy
>
>
>
> _
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Tomas Matousek <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> tfpt review "/shelveset:VisibilityAndOtherFixes2;REDMOND\tomat"
> Comment :
> Implements
> - private method visibility
>
>
*drools*
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Pr
o:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Michael Letterle
> *Sent:* Friday, November 14, 2008 6:18 PM
>
> *To:* ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Ironruby-core] Executables
>
>
>
> ? interop works through IRB just as well...
>
> C:\>ir ruby\bin\irb
>
tem::Windows::Forms::Form.new
=> #
irb(main):004:0> i = f.show_dialog
=> #
Am I missing something?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Tomas Matousek <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need DLR REPL for testing interop.
>
>
>
> Tomas
>
>
>
> *From:* [EMAIL
and
> write to its input stream).
>
>
>
> Another option would be to have a single executable ir.exe that behaves
> like ruby.exe and e.g. --dlr switch that makes it run DLR REPL loop.
>
>
>
> Tomas
>
> ___
3950335
> => nil
>
> Is this by design?
>
> Thanks
>
> Ben
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
> _
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
> ___
er .NET interop support and don't have
> very much test coverage yet – but this should let you get going on some more
> sophisticated interop scenarios than were previously possible.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Curt Hagenlocher
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core
___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
--
Michael Letterle
[Polymath Prokrammer]
http://blog.prokrams.com
___
Ironruby-core mailing list
Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
t; > ___
> > Ironruby-core mailing list
> > Ironruby-core@rubyforge.org
> > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/ironruby-core
>
> ___
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Ironru
The assumption would be that the project layouts don't change that often,
certainly less often the the cs files which is what is really being
maintained in the IDE most of the time.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:04 AM, John Lam (IRONRUBY)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Michael Letterle:
er at Saturday, August 16, 2008 1:57 PM:
> >
> > Michael Letterle wrote:
> >> Or update the csproj so that the file names are cased correctly for *nix
> >> (note that the casing isn't a MONO thing, it's a OS thing), Windows will
> >> continue to
iles in Visual Studio,
> I would run a rake file which would generate me the csproj + sln and
> launch VS?
>
> On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Michael Letterle
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was up till 4am last night at eRubyCon, and this is just me thinking
> >
g.
>
> I could probably use threading to achieve this or different appdomains
> maybe.
>
> any thoughts?
>
> Cheers
> Ivan
>
> _______
> Ironruby-core mailing list
> Iron
x27;re not beholden
to VS strong armness?
Just a random crazy thought.
On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Jim Deville <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just trying to think of something that wouldn't get messed up again.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Le
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
